A Comparison of Surface and Internally Measured Myoelectric Signals for use in Prosthetic Control

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2005

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

454
views
681
downloads

Abstract

The surface myoelectric signal (MES) has proven to be an effective control input for powered prostheses. Pattern recognition based controllers use multi-channel surface MES as inputs to discriminate between the desired classes of limb activation. There are two major methods which may be pursued to increase the accuracy of the controller: 1) use signal processing to extract more information from the input signals; or 2) provide more informative raw signals to the controller. As a result of recent technological advances, it is reasonable to assume that there will soon be implantable myoelectric sensors which will enable the internal MES to be used as inputs to controllers [1]. An internal MES measurement should have less muscular crosstalk allowing for more independent control sites. However, it remains unclear if this benefit outweighs the loss of the more global information contained in the surface MES. This study compares the classification accuracy of several pattern based myoelectric controllers which use information extracted from surface MES to the same controllers which use information extracted from fine-wire intramuscular MES.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Proceedings of the MEC’05 conference, UNB; 2005.

Citation

Hargrove, L., B. Hudgins, K. Englehart and R. Leckey (2005). A Comparison of Surface and Internally Measured Myoelectric Signals for use in Prosthetic Control. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/2709.


Copyright 2002, 2005 and 2008, The University of New Brunswick.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Creative Commons License