Do specialty courts achieve better outcomes for children in foster care than general courts?

dc.contributor.author

Sloan, Frank A

dc.contributor.author

Gifford, Elizabeth J

dc.contributor.author

Eldred, Lindsey M

dc.contributor.author

Acquah, Kofi F

dc.contributor.author

Blevins, Claire E

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2016-09-28T22:19:41Z

dc.date.issued

2013-02

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effects of unified family and drug treatment courts (DTCs) on the resolution of cases involving foster care children and the resulting effects on school performance. METHOD: The first analytic step was to assess the impacts of presence of unified and DTCs in North Carolina counties on time children spent in foster care and the type of placement at exit from foster care. In the second step, the same data on foster care placements were merged with school records for youth in Grades 3-8 in public schools. The effect of children's time in foster care and placement outcomes on school performance as measured by math and reading tests, grade retention, and attendance was assessed using child fixed-effects regression. RESULTS: Children in counties with unified family courts experienced shorter foster care spells and higher rates of reunification with parents or primary caregivers. Shorter foster care spells translated into improved school performance measured by end-of-grade reading and math test scores. Adult DTCs were associated with lower probability of reunification with parents/primary caregivers. CONCLUSION: The shortened time in foster care implies an efficiency gain attributable to unified family courts, which translate into savings for the court system through the use of fewer resources. Children also benefit through shortened stays in temporary placements, which are related to some improved educational outcomes.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23737613

dc.identifier

0193841X13487536

dc.identifier.eissn

1552-3926

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12807

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Eval Rev

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/0193841X13487536

dc.subject

child welfare

dc.subject

crime and justice (adult and juvenile)

dc.subject

education

dc.subject

Adolescent

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Child

dc.subject

Child Custody

dc.subject

Child Welfare

dc.subject

Child of Impaired Parents

dc.subject

Educational Status

dc.subject

Efficiency, Organizational

dc.subject

Family

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Foster Home Care

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Juvenile Delinquency

dc.subject

Longitudinal Studies

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

North Carolina

dc.subject

Poverty

dc.subject

Regression Analysis

dc.subject

Substance Abuse Treatment Centers

dc.subject

Time Factors

dc.title

Do specialty courts achieve better outcomes for children in foster care than general courts?

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Gifford, Elizabeth J|0000-0002-1488-0286

duke.contributor.orcid

Eldred, Lindsey M|0000-0002-5785-0423

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23737613

pubs.begin-page

3

pubs.end-page

34

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Population Health & Aging

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Population Research Center

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Population Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Economics

pubs.organisational-group

Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institute of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Public Policy Studies

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing - Secondary Group

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

37

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sloan_2013_Evaluation_Review-1.pdf
Size:
272.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version