Systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine: postoperative cancer outcomes.

dc.contributor.author

Buggy, DJ

dc.contributor.author

Freeman, J

dc.contributor.author

Johnson, MZ

dc.contributor.author

Leslie, K

dc.contributor.author

Riedel, B

dc.contributor.author

Sessler, DI

dc.contributor.author

Kurz, A

dc.contributor.author

Gottumukkala, V

dc.contributor.author

Short, T

dc.contributor.author

Pace, N

dc.contributor.author

Myles, PS

dc.contributor.author

StEP-COMPAC Group

dc.date.accessioned

2018-07-24T15:47:10Z

dc.date.available

2018-07-24T15:47:10Z

dc.date.issued

2018-07

dc.date.updated

2018-07-24T15:47:09Z

dc.description.abstract

The Standardising Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine group was established to derive an appropriate set of endpoints for use in clinical trials related to anaesthesia and perioperative medicine. Anaesthetic or analgesic technique during cancer surgery with curative intent may influence the risk of recurrence or metastasis. However, given the current equipoise in the existing literature, prospective, randomised, controlled trials are necessary to test this hypothesis. As such, a cancer subgroup was formed to derive endpoints related to research in onco-anaesthesia based on a current evidence base, international consensus and expert guidance.We undertook a systematic review to identify measures of oncological outcome used in the oncological, surgical, and wider literature. A multiround Delphi consensus process that included up to 89 clinician-researchers was then used to refine a recommended list of endpoints.We identified 90 studies in a literature search, which were the basis for a preliminary list of nine outcome measures and their definitions. A further two were added during the Delphi process. Response rates for Delphi rounds one, two, and three were 88% (n=9), 82% (n=73), and 100% (n=10), respectively. A final list of 10 defined endpoints was refined and developed, of which six secured approval by ≥70% of the group: cancer health related quality of life, days alive and out of hospital at 90 days, time to tumour progression, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival (and 5-yr overall survival).Standardised endpoints in clinical outcomes studies will support benchmarking and pooling (meta-analysis) of trials. It is therefore recommended that one or more of these consensus-derived endpoints should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials evaluating a causal effect of anaesthesia-analgesia technique on oncological outcomes.

dc.identifier

S0007-0912(18)30276-9

dc.identifier.issn

0007-0912

dc.identifier.issn

1471-6771

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17268

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

British journal of anaesthesia

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.020

dc.subject

StEP-COMPAC Group

dc.title

Systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine: postoperative cancer outcomes.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Miller, Timothy|0000-0001-8567-6680

pubs.begin-page

38

pubs.end-page

44

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, General, Vascular, High Risk Transplant & Critical Care

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

121

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
StEP-COMPAC cancer outcomes. 2018.pdf
Size:
173.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format