Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis With a Biplanar Locking Plate System Versus the Modified Lapidus Technique With Crossed-Screw Fixation: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison.
Date
2026-02
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Background: Hallux valgus (HV) is recognized as a triplanar deformity. A biplanar locking plate (BLP) system corrects this deformity through first tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) arthrodesis, with specialized reduction tools and cutting guides. Yet the optimal surgical technique and fixation construct for first TMTJ arthrodesis remains controversial. Purpose: We sought to compare the BLP system with a modified Lapidus (ML) technique with crossed-screw fixation in terms of radiographic outcomes, complications, and reoperations. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, we identified a series of consecutive patients who underwent first TMTJ arthrodesis for HV with either the ML procedure at institution A or the BLP system at institution B. Patients 18 years of age with a minimum of 6 months of postoperative radiographs were included. There were 130 patients, 65 in each group, including 121 women (93.8%) with a median age of 58 years and mean radiographic follow-up of 7.1 months. Data included preoperative and postoperative HV angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and tibial sesamoid position (TSP), plus complications and reoperations. Statistical testing included Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank, Fisher exact, McNemar, and multivariable regression. Results: After adjusting for confounding variables, the BLP system was associated with significantly greater improvements in postoperative IMA and HVA but not TSP. There were no significant differences in rates of complications (ML: 18.4%; BLP: 9.2%) or reoperations (ML: 4.6%; BLP: 7.7%). Conclusion: This retrospective multicenter review found that the BLP system was associated with greater improvement in radiographic HV parameters compared with the ML procedure using crossed-screw fixation. Clinical significance is unclear as complication and reoperation rates were similar between groups. Further study in this regard is warranted.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Fletcher, Amanda N, Lindsey G Droz, Robert Fuller, Lavan Rajan, Jiaqi Zhu, Mark E Easley, James A Nunley, Elizabeth A Cody, et al. (2026). Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis With a Biplanar Locking Plate System Versus the Modified Lapidus Technique With Crossed-Screw Fixation: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison. HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 22(1). pp. 42–49. 10.1177/15563316241288514 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34400.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Mark Erik Easley
James Albert Nunley
My current research interests are both clinical and basic science. Currently, in the Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, we are investigating the biomechanical properties of the deltoid ligament in the ankle. This is a clinically relevant problem and we will hopefully identify ways to improve the correction of the adult relaxed flat foot. We are also performing a preliminary investigation into the blood supply of the distal tibia to look for a vascularized bone transfer.
We have recently completed a biomechanical study looking at the strength of fixation for proximal metatarsal osteotomies in the correction of hallux valgus and that information has been submitted for publication.
Clinical projects have looked into nerve palsies after total elbow replacement and to reconstructive upper and lower extremity surgery.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.