Looking at the Big Picture: An Analysis of Children’s Family Drawings Across Culture
Date
2019-04-22
Authors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Abstract
Because the family plays such a vital role in child development, it is important to understand how children conceptualize their families and how these conceptualizations are shaped by their broader social context and culture. The current study asked children from the United States (n = 121, 60 female, M = 5.06 years) and Nicaragua (n = 22, 12 female, M = 8.68 years) to “draw a picture of their family.” A coding scheme was adapted (Cherney et al., 2006) to analyze the drawings and included 3 categories (family members, details, and spatial arrangement). Results show that across gender, girls were more likely than boys to accurately depict the correct number of people living in their households (p < .05) and to draw more overall details (p < .05). Children from Nicaragua included significantly more people in their drawings (p < .001), more people outside of their nuclear families (p = .01), and more ears on their figures (p < .001). On the other hand, American children included more mouths (p < .01) and smiles (p < .001), and drew their figures taller (p < .01) and with greater differentiation in height (p < .05). Nicaraguan children were more likely to anchor their figures using heads as a baseline, while American children more often used feet as a baseline (p < .001). Understanding how children’s drawings of their families are shaped by gender and culture will provide significant insight into their early concepts of their social world.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Citation
Hajda, Hana (2019). Looking at the Big Picture: An Analysis of Children’s Family Drawings Across Culture. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18470.
Except where otherwise noted, student scholarship that was shared on DukeSpace after 2009 is made available to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial / No derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license. All rights in student work shared on DukeSpace before 2009 remain with the author and/or their designee, whose permission may be required for reuse.