Economic Outcomes With Anatomical Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease.

dc.contributor.author

Mark, Daniel B

dc.contributor.author

Federspiel, Jerome J

dc.contributor.author

Cowper, Patricia A

dc.contributor.author

Anstrom, Kevin J

dc.contributor.author

Hoffmann, Udo

dc.contributor.author

Patel, Manesh R

dc.contributor.author

Davidson-Ray, Linda

dc.contributor.author

Daniels, Melanie R

dc.contributor.author

Cooper, Lawton S

dc.contributor.author

Knight, J David

dc.contributor.author

Lee, Kerry L

dc.contributor.author

Douglas, Pamela S

dc.contributor.author

PROMISE Investigators

dc.date.accessioned

2022-11-05T19:41:51Z

dc.date.available

2022-11-05T19:41:51Z

dc.date.issued

2016-07

dc.date.updated

2022-11-05T19:41:50Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus functional diagnostic testing strategies did not improve clinical outcomes in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring noninvasive testing.

Objective

To conduct an economic analysis for PROMISE (a major secondary aim of the study).

Design

Prospective economic study from the U.S. perspective. Comparisons were made according to the intention-to-treat principle, and CIs were calculated using bootstrap methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01174550).

Setting

190 U.S. centers.

Patients

9649 U.S. patients enrolled in PROMISE between July 2010 and September 2013. Median follow-up was 25 months.

Measurements

Technical costs of the initial (outpatient) testing strategy were estimated from Premier Research Database data. Hospital-based costs were estimated using hospital bills and Medicare cost-charge ratios. Physician fees were taken from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars, discounted at 3% annually, and estimated out to 3 years using inverse probability weighting methods.

Results

The mean initial testing costs were $174 for exercise electrocardiography; $404 for CTA; $501 to $514 for pharmacologic and exercise stress echocardiography, respectively; and $946 to $1132 for exercise and pharmacologic stress nuclear testing, respectively. Mean costs at 90 days were $2494 for the CTA strategy versus $2240 for the functional strategy (mean difference, $254 [95% CI, -$634 to $906]). The difference was associated with more revascularizations and catheterizations (4.25 per 100 patients) with CTA use. After 90 days, the mean cost difference between the groups out to 3 years remained small.

Limitation

Cost weights for test strategies were obtained from sources outside PROMISE.

Conclusion

Computed tomography angiography and functional diagnostic testing strategies in patients with suspected CAD have similar costs through 3 years of follow-up.

Primary funding source

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
dc.identifier

2525715

dc.identifier.issn

0003-4819

dc.identifier.issn

1539-3704

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26201

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

American College of Physicians

dc.relation.ispartof

Annals of internal medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.7326/m15-2639

dc.subject

PROMISE Investigators

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Chest Pain

dc.subject

Coronary Angiography

dc.subject

Echocardiography, Stress

dc.subject

Heart Function Tests

dc.subject

Electrocardiography

dc.subject

Exercise Test

dc.subject

Prospective Studies

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Hospital Costs

dc.subject

Fees, Medical

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Coronary Artery Disease

dc.subject

Multidetector Computed Tomography

dc.title

Economic Outcomes With Anatomical Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Mark, Daniel B|0000-0001-6340-8087

duke.contributor.orcid

Federspiel, Jerome J|0000-0003-0321-6280

duke.contributor.orcid

Patel, Manesh R|0000-0001-6477-9728

duke.contributor.orcid

Douglas, Pamela S|0000-0001-9876-4049

pubs.begin-page

94

pubs.end-page

102

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Faculty

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology

pubs.organisational-group

Radiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Fetal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

165

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Economic Outcomes with Anatomic versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease = 2016 .pdf
Size:
336.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format