Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in Adult Spinal Deformity.
Date
2024-02
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Study design
Retrospective cohort.Objective
To examine the validity of the ODI in ASD patients treated with surgery.Summary of background data
The ODI is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of low back pain and disability. While nearly ubiquitous in adult spinal deformity (ASD) research, the measure has not been validated in this patient population.Methods
A registry of ASD patients was queried for baseline and 1-year PROM data, including the ODI, the SRS-22r, and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference (PI), and -Physical Function(PF) computer adaptive tests (CAT). Internal reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, where values≥0.7 are considered reliable. Validity was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients calculated for the ODI against validated PROMIS-Pain Interference and -Physical Function and legacy measures SRS-Pain, SRS-Activity. Responsiveness to change was measured with the adjusted effect size (aES).Results
325 patients were enrolled, with 208 completing baseline and one-year PROMs. The majority (149, 72%) were female and white (193, 93%), median Charlson Comorbidity Index 0 (IQR 0-2). The majority of cases included sagittal plane deformity (mean T1PA 24.2° (13.9). Cronbach's alpha showed excellent internal reliability (Baseline=0.89, 1yr=0.90). ODI was valid, with strong correlations between PROMIS-PI, -PF, SRS-Pain, and SRS-Activity at baseline and one-year follow-up. All measures were responsive to change, with the ODI showing greater responsiveness than PROMIS-PI, PROMIS-PF and SRS-Activity.Conclusions
The ODI is a valid measure of disability as measured by pain and function in patients with ASD. It is responsive to change in a manner not different from validated PROMIS-CAT or the SRS-22r legacy measure. It is multidimensional, however, as it assesses both pain and function simultaneously. It does not measure disability related to Self-Image and may not account for all disease-related disability in ASD patients.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Jalali, Omid, Justin S Smith, Shay Bess, Richard Hostin, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames, et al. (2024). Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine. 10.1097/brs.0000000000004960 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30194.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.