Inequality in Education -- an Overview of Rural Extra-budgetary Education Funding in China
Date
2011
Authors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to analyze education inequality in rural China as reflected in government funding policy on education. Specifically, the research looks whether extra-budgetary income is a dis-equalizing factor in provincial level education spending or rather equalizes in education spending. Via analysis of existing data on education financing in more recent year, it was shown that the inequality of spending in total education expenditure per capita is greater than budgetary expenditure from government sources in the year 2006 and 2008 for elementary schools, and 2002 and 2006 for middle schools. More specific regression analysis has shown that extra-education levies exaggerate financial inequality between provinces. Gini coefficient calculations of education income per capita are slightly different from the expenditure calculations. Furthermore, regional comparison has shown that richer provinces would actually rely more of the share of their education revenue on extra-budgetary sources. This would suggests that extra-budgetary income is not used to compensate for the lack of budgetary funding and expectantly equalize education resources between regions, as assumed by the central government in China, rather, it actually sometimes widens the gap in financing education in rural China.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Citation
Qin, Lu (2011). Inequality in Education -- an Overview of Rural Extra-budgetary Education Funding in China. Master's thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3791.
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, student scholarship that was shared on DukeSpace after 2009 is made available to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial / No derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license. All rights in student work shared on DukeSpace before 2009 remain with the author and/or their designee, whose permission may be required for reuse.