Climate Change Is Here, but Who Is Paying for It?

Mulderrig, Conor

Profeta, Timothy

Thompson, Elizabeth

2023-02-20T17:59:59Z

2023-02-20T17:59:59Z

2020-06-24

2023-02-20T17:59:58Z

In an era of increased political polarization and decreased confidence in national institutions, many bold initiatives have stalled or met an untimely end. This abdication of federal responsibility is no more evident than the ongoing response to COVID-19. Strategic response to the pandemic has largely shifted from the White House to governors’ mansions.

A renewed era of federalism is beginning to take shape, and it is important to consider potential ramifications in other pressing areas—specifically climate change. State and local governments have advanced their own initiatives on climate change when faced with a failure of federal leadership. States have launched climate strategies to combat this growing threat both individually and in coalition. However, in order to mitigate and develop resiliency to climate change, much more needs to be done. This analysis will look at one aspect of the challenge: understanding costs.

Resource management for states with ever-thin operational budgets is already logistically daunting without the massive investment in preventative measures needed to meaningfully combat climate change. Where do they start? Do states across the board have the technical capacity to understand what impacts they have already been facing? The resounding answer at this current moment is no.

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26639

Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions

COVID-19

climate change

resiliency

resource management

Climate Change Is Here, but Who Is Paying for It?

Report

Duke

Sanford School of Public Policy

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

University Institutes and Centers

Initiatives

Duke Science & Society

Nicholas Institute-Energy Initiative

Published online