Incentives to Quit in Men’s Professional Tennis: An Empirical Test of Tournament Theory

dc.contributor.advisor

Arcidiacono, Peter

dc.contributor.advisor

Kim, Grace

dc.contributor.author

Walker, William

dc.date.accessioned

2018-05-16T18:10:27Z

dc.date.available

2018-05-16T18:10:27Z

dc.date.issued

2018-04-18

dc.department

Economics

dc.description.abstract

This paper studies the influence of incentives on quitting behaviors in professional men’s tennis tournaments and offers broader implications to pay structures in the labor market. Precedent literature established that prize incentives and skill heterogeneity can impact player effort exertion. Prize incentives include prize money and indirect financial rewards (ranking points). Players may also exert less effort when there is a significant difference in skill between the match favorite and the match underdog. Results warrant three important conclusions. First, prize incentives (particularly prize money) do influence a player’s likelihood of quitting. Results on skill heterogeneity are less conclusive, though being the “match favorite” could reduce the odds of quitting. Finally, match underdogs and “unseeded” players may be especially susceptible to the influence of prize incentives when considering whether to quit.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/16731

dc.language.iso

en_US

dc.subject

Tournament Theory

dc.subject

Incentives

dc.subject

Tennis

dc.subject

Quitting

dc.subject

Compensation

dc.subject

Sports Economics

dc.title

Incentives to Quit in Men’s Professional Tennis: An Empirical Test of Tournament Theory

dc.type

Honors thesis

duke.embargo.months

0

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Walker2018.pdf
Size:
515.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Honors Thesis Final Draft