"Call for prices": Strategic implications of raising consumers' costs

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2010-01-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

310
views
522
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Many consumer durable retailers often do not advertise their prices and instead ask consumers to call them for prices. It is easy to see that this practice increases the consumers' cost of learning the prices of products they are considering, yet firms commonly use such practices. Not advertising prices may reduce the firm's advertising costs, but the strategic effects of doing so are not clear. Our objective is to examine the strategic effects of this practice. In particular, how does making price discovery more difficult for consumers affect competing retailers' price, service decisions, and profits? We develop a model in which a manufacturer sells its product through a high-service retailer and a low-service retailer. Consumers can purchase the retail service at the high-end retailer and purchase the product at the competing low-end retailer. Therefore, the high-end retailer faces a free-riding problem. A retailer first chooses its optimal service levels. Then, it chooses its optimal price levels. Finally, a retailer decides whether to advertise its prices. The model results in four structures: (1) both retailers advertise prices, (2) only the low-service retailer advertises price, (3) only the high-service retailer advertises price, and (4) neither retailer advertises price. We find that when a retailer does not advertise its price and makes price discovery more difficult for consumers, the competition between the retailers is less intense. However, the retailer is forced to charge a lower price. In addition, if the competing retailer does advertise its prices, then the competing retailer enjoys higher profit margins. We identify conditions under which each of the above four structures is an equilibrium and show that a low-service retailer not advertising its price is a more likely outcome than a high-service retailer doing so. We then solve the manufacturer's problem and find that there are several instances when a retailer's advertising decisions are different from what the manufacturer would want. We describe the nature of this channel coordination problem and identify some solutions. © 2010 INFORMS.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1287/mksc.1090.0498

Publication Info

Desai, PS, A Krishnamoorthy and P Sainam (2010). "Call for prices": Strategic implications of raising consumers' costs. Marketing Science, 29(1). pp. 158–174. 10.1287/mksc.1090.0498 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/4422.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Desai

Preyas S. Desai

Spencer Hassell Distinguished Professor of Business Administration

Preyas Desai is the Spencer R. Hassell Professor of Business Administration at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Professor Desai received M.S. and Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon University, and was on the faculty of Purdue University before joining Duke in 1997.

Professor Desai’s research covers a wide range of topics in marketing strategy, distribution channels, and marketing of durable products. His research analyzes strategic interactions such as those among competing firms, and among firms partnering within a distribution channel. His articles on these topics have appeared in top-tier academic journals such as Marketing Science, Management Science, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, and Quantitative Marketing and Economics. He has served as a departmental editor for Management Science and is currently the editor-in-chief of Marketing Science.

At Fuqua, Professor Desai has served as the chair of school’s Curriculum Committee, Faculty Technology Committee, co-chair of Strategic Planning task force, and the area coordinator for the marketing area. He is currently a member of the dean’s advisory committee. He is a member of Duke’s academic council and also serves on the Academic Committee on Online Education (ACOE).


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.