A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2005-08-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

280
views
4362
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Market failures associated with environmental pollution interact with market failures associated with the innovation and diffusion of new technologies. These combined market failures provide a strong rationale for a portfolio of public policies that foster emissions reduction as well as the development and adoption of environmentally beneficial technology. Both theory and empirical evidence suggest that the rate and direction of technological advance is influenced by market and regulatory incentives, and can be cost-effectively harnessed through the use of economic-incentive based policy. In the presence of weak or nonexistent environmental policies, investments in the development and diffusion of new environmentally beneficial technologies are very likely to be less than would be socially desirable. Positive knowledge and adoption spillovers and information problems can further weaken innovation incentives. While environmental technology policy is fraught with difficulties, a long-term view suggests a strategy of experimenting with policy approaches and systematically evaluating their success. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027

Publication Info

Jaffe, AB, RG Newell and RN Stavins (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 54(2-3). pp. 164–174. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10267.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.