Human mortality improvement in evolutionary context.
Abstract
Life expectancy is increasing in most countries and has exceeded 80 in several, as
low-mortality nations continue to make progress in averting deaths. The health and
economic implications of mortality reduction have been given substantial attention,
but the observed malleability of human mortality has not been placed in a broad evolutionary
context. We quantify the rate and amount of mortality reduction by comparing a variety
of human populations to the evolved human mortality profile, here estimated as the
average mortality pattern for ethnographically observed hunter-gatherers. We show
that human mortality has decreased so substantially that the difference between hunter-gatherers
and today's lowest mortality populations is greater than the difference between hunter-gatherers
and wild chimpanzees. The bulk of this mortality reduction has occurred since 1900
and has been experienced by only about 4 of the roughly 8,000 human generations that
have ever lived. Moreover, mortality improvement in humans is on par with or greater
than the reductions in mortality in other species achieved by laboratory selection
experiments and endocrine pathway mutations. This observed plasticity in age-specific
risk of death is at odds with conventional theories of aging.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14773Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1073/pnas.1215627109Publication Info
Burger, Oskar; Baudisch, Annette; & Vaupel, James W (2012). Human mortality improvement in evolutionary context. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109(44). pp. 18210-18214. 10.1073/pnas.1215627109. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14773.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
James Walton Vaupel
Research Professor Emeritus in the Sanford School of Public Policy
This author no longer has a Scholars@Duke profile, so the information shown here reflects
their Duke status at the time this item was deposited.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info