Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting.
Repository Usage Stats
Clinical trials and systematic reviews of clinical trials inform healthcare decisions. There is growing concern, however, about results from clinical trials that cannot be reproduced. Reasons for nonreproducibility include that outcomes are defined in multiple ways, results can be obtained using multiple methods of analysis, and trial findings are reported in multiple sources ("multiplicity"). Multiplicity combined with selective reporting can influence dissemination of trial findings and decision-making. In particular, users of evidence might be misled by exposure to selected sources and overly optimistic representations of intervention effects. In this commentary, drawing from our experience in the Multiple Data Sources in Systematic Reviews (MUDS) study and evidence from previous research, we offer practical recommendations to enhance the reproducibility of clinical trials and systematic reviews.
Reproducibility of Results
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Published Version (Please cite this version)10.1186/s13063-018-2888-9
Publication InfoLi, Tianjing; Mayo-Wilson, Evan; Fusco, Nicole; Hong, Hwanhee; & Dickersin, Kay (2018). Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting. Trials, 19(1). pp. 497. 10.1186/s13063-018-2888-9. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18574.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
More InfoShow full item record
Associate Professor of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
I am interested in developing Bayesian statistical methods for comparative effectiveness research, network meta-analysis, causal inference, measurement error, and generalizability. A flexible Bayesian modeling framework enables us to easily integrate different data sources and borrow information adaptively across them. The ultimate goal of my research is to provide comprehensive evidence from multiple data sources for answering clinical and scientific questions in public health and medicine.
Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info