dc.contributor.author |
Miles, Simon |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-09-09T19:05:20Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-09-09T19:05:20Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-08 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1520-3972 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1531-3298 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21419 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:p> Did the Cold War of the 1980s nearly turn hot? Much has been made of the
November 1983 Able Archer 83 command-post exercise, which is often described as having
nearly precipitated a nuclear war when paranoid Warsaw Pact policymakers suspected
that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was using the exercise to launch
a preemptive nuclear strike. This article challenges that narrative, using new evidence
from the archives of the former Warsaw Pact countries. It shows that the much-touted
intelligence effort to assess Western intentions and capabilities, Project RYaN, which
supposedly triggered fears of a surprise attack, was nowhere near operational at the
time of Able Archer 83. It also presents an account of the Pact's sanguine observations
of Able Archer 83. In doing so, it advances key debates in the historiography of the
late Cold War pertaining to the stability and durability of the nuclear peace. </jats:p>
|
|
dc.language |
en |
|
dc.publisher |
MIT Press - Journals |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Journal of Cold War Studies |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1162/jcws_a_00952 |
|
dc.title |
The War Scare That Wasn't: Able Archer 83 and the Myths of the Second Cold War |
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Miles, Simon|0792904 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2020-09-09T19:05:19Z |
|
pubs.begin-page |
86 |
|
pubs.end-page |
118 |
|
pubs.issue |
3 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Sanford School of Public Policy |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
History |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Slavic and Eurasian Studies |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Trinity College of Arts & Sciences |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
pubs.volume |
22 |
|