Mill's Unrevised Philosophy of Economics: A Comment on Hausman

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

1986-03

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

Hausman has argued that Mill in the Logic demands verification of qualified, inexact statements if they are to be considered lawlike. This puts Mill in line with a reasonable interpretation of what modern microeconomists are about, but requires the additional hypothesis that Mill abandoned his earlier stress on modal truth in his 1836 essay on the method of economics. The paper maintains that neither textual nor contextual evidence supports this hypothesis. Moreover, it is superfluous if one attends carefully to how Mill conceived economic science, which occupied a peculiar, somewhat isolated place in his own views on the deductive method and on verification.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

De Marchi, Neil. Mill's Unrevised Philosophy of Economics: A Comment on Hausman. Philosophy of Science. 53.1 (March 1986): 89-100. Print.

Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.