E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Cetus Corporation
In 1989, American chemical company, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., filed suit against Cetus Corporation, alleging the Cetus core PCR patents were not novel. Despite strong witnesses, DuPont could not prove that PCR invention had been obvious, and court ruled in favor of Cetus.
Recent Submissions
-
Deposition of Tom White
(1990-10-05) -
Verdict
(1991-02-27) -
Jury Instructions
(1991-02-25) -
Plaintiff Closing Arguments, Part 2
(1991-02-21) -
Defense Closing Arguments
(1991-02-21) -
Plaintiff Closing Arguments, Part 1
(1991-02-21) -
Jury Instructions
(1991-02-21) -
Open Court
(1991-02-20) -
Testimony of Kary Mullis, Recalled
(1991-02-19) -
Testimony of Ian Molineux, Recalled
(1991-02-19) -
Testimony of Robert Bruce Wallace, Recalled
(1991-02-19) -
Testimony of James Eric Dahlberg, Recalled
(1991-02-19) -
Testimony of Arthur Kornberg, Recalled
(1991-02-19) -
Testimony of Henry Erlich
(1991-02-13) -
Testimony of French Anderson
(1991-02-13) -
Testimony of James Eric Dahlberg
(1991-02-11) -
Testimony of Rudolph Anderson
(1991-02-07) -
Testimony of Kary Mullis
(1991-02-05) -
Testimony of Hamilton Othanel Smith
(1991-02-04) -
Testimony of Joseph Oliver Falkinham III
(1991-02-04)
RSS 1.0