Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Duke University Employee Commuters: The Cost-Effectiveness of Reductions
Abstract
Duke University is seeking to decrease greenhouse gas emissions from its employee
commuters. I build a linear optimization model to predict Duke University and Medical
Center employee commute mode share. Combining these results with a forecast of Duke
employee growth, I calculate the impact on employee commuter greenhouse gas emissions
of 1) existing Duke carpooling and bus subsidies, 2) a $10 per month increase in employee
parking costs and 3) a $20 per month increase in employee parking costs. The cost-effectiveness
of these measures in 2015 to Duke University is $309.96 per mtCO2e for existing policy,
-$248.87 per mtCO2e for a $10 per month increase in parking costs and -$516.21 per
mtCO2e for a $20 per month increase in parking costs. Including costs to commuters,
the cost-effectiveness of these policies to society as a whole is $57.41, $84.18,
and $399.82 per mtCO2e. From the perspective of Duke University, excluding costs to
employee commuters, the existing policy scenario is the least cost-effective strategy
for achieving greenhouse gas emissions reductions from employee commuters. The parking
cost increases are the least cost-effective when costs to employee commuters are included.
From this combined perspective, the existing policy scenario is the most cost-effective
policy.
Type
Master's projectPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/852Citation
Potes, Andres (2008). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Duke University Employee Commuters: The Cost-Effectiveness
of Reductions. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/852.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info