More Is More: Drivers of the Increase in Emergency Medicine Residency Applications.

dc.contributor.author

Huang, Robert D

dc.contributor.author

Lutfy-Clayton, Lucienne

dc.contributor.author

Franzen, Douglas

dc.contributor.author

Pelletier-Bui, Alexis

dc.contributor.author

Gordon, David C

dc.contributor.author

Jarou, Zachary

dc.contributor.author

Cranford, Jim

dc.contributor.author

Hopson, Laura R

dc.date.accessioned

2021-02-01T16:52:27Z

dc.date.available

2021-02-01T16:52:27Z

dc.date.issued

2020-12-10

dc.date.updated

2021-02-01T16:52:27Z

dc.description.abstract

Introduction

The average number of applications per allopathic applicant to emergency medicine (EM) residency programs in the United States (US) has increased significantly since 2014. This increase in applications has caused a significant burden on both programs and applicants. Our goal in this study was to investigate the drivers of this application increase so as to inform strategies to mitigate the surge.

Methods

An expert panel designed an anonymous, web-based survey, which was distributed to US allopathic senior applicants in the 2017-2018 EM match cycle via the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine and the Emergency Medicine Residents Association listservs for completion between the rank list certification deadline and release of match results. The survey collected descriptive statistics and factors affecting application decisions.

Results

A total of 532 of 1748 (30.4%) US allopathic seniors responded to the survey. Of these respondents, 47.3% felt they had applied to too many programs, 11.8% felt they had applied to too few, and 57.7% felt that their perception of their own competitiveness increased their number of applications. Application behavior of peers going into EM was identified as the largest external factor driving an increase in applications (61.1%), followed by US Medical Licensing Exam scores (46.9%) - the latter was most pronounced in applicants who self-perceived as "less competitive." The most significant limiter of application numbers was the cost of using the Electronic Residency Application Service (34.3%).

Conclusion

A substantial group of EM applicants identified that they were over-applying to residencies. The largest driver of this process was individual applicant response to the behavior of their peers who were also going into EM. Understanding these motivations may help inform solutions to overapplication.
dc.identifier

westjem.2020.10.48210

dc.identifier.issn

1936-900X

dc.identifier.issn

1936-9018

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22296

dc.language

eng

dc.relation.ispartof

The western journal of emergency medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.5811/westjem.2020.10.48210

dc.title

More Is More: Drivers of the Increase in Emergency Medicine Residency Applications.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

77

pubs.end-page

85

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Emergency Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

22

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
More Is More Drivers of the Increase in Emergency Medicine Residency Applications.pdf
Size:
453.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format