A Logical Model of Homology for Comparative Biology.

dc.contributor.author

Mabee, Paula M

dc.contributor.author

Balhoff, James P

dc.contributor.author

Dahdul, Wasila M

dc.contributor.author

Lapp, Hilmar

dc.contributor.author

Mungall, Christopher J

dc.contributor.author

Vision, Todd J

dc.contributor.editor

Smith, Stephen

dc.date.accessioned

2023-02-07T20:31:02Z

dc.date.available

2023-02-07T20:31:02Z

dc.date.issued

2020-03

dc.date.updated

2023-02-07T20:31:00Z

dc.description.abstract

There is a growing body of research on the evolution of anatomy in a wide variety of organisms. Discoveries in this field could be greatly accelerated by computational methods and resources that enable these findings to be compared across different studies and different organisms and linked with the genes responsible for anatomical modifications. Homology is a key concept in comparative anatomy; two important types are historical homology (the similarity of organisms due to common ancestry) and serial homology (the similarity of repeated structures within an organism). We explored how to most effectively represent historical and serial homology across anatomical structures to facilitate computational reasoning. We assembled a collection of homology assertions from the literature with a set of taxon phenotypes for the skeletal elements of vertebrate fins and limbs from the Phenoscape Knowledgebase. Using seven competency questions, we evaluated the reasoning ramifications of two logical models: the Reciprocal Existential Axioms (REA) homology model and the Ancestral Value Axioms (AVA) homology model. The AVA model returned all user-expected results in addition to the search term and any of its subclasses. The AVA model also returns any superclass of the query term in which a homology relationship has been asserted. The REA model returned the user-expected results for five out of seven queries. We identify some challenges of implementing complete homology queries due to limitations of OWL reasoning. This work lays the foundation for homology reasoning to be incorporated into other ontology-based tools, such as those that enable synthetic supermatrix construction and candidate gene discovery. [Homology; ontology; anatomy; morphology; evolution; knowledgebase; phenoscape.].

dc.identifier

5584267

dc.identifier.issn

1063-5157

dc.identifier.issn

1076-836X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26578

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

dc.relation.ispartof

Systematic biology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1093/sysbio/syz067

dc.subject

Extremities

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Vertebrates

dc.subject

Models, Biological

dc.subject

Classification

dc.subject

Animal Fins

dc.title

A Logical Model of Homology for Comparative Biology.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Lapp, Hilmar|0000-0001-9107-0714

pubs.begin-page

345

pubs.end-page

362

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

69

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Logical Model of Homology for Comparative Biology.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version