Changes in analgesic strategies for lobectomy from 2009 to 2018

dc.contributor.author

Lo, Theresa

dc.contributor.author

Schiller, Robin

dc.contributor.author

Raghunathan, Karthik

dc.contributor.author

Krishnamoorthy, Vijay

dc.contributor.author

Jawitz, Oliver K

dc.contributor.author

Pyati, Srinivas

dc.contributor.author

Van De Ven, Thomas

dc.contributor.author

Bartz, Raquel R

dc.contributor.author

Thompson, Annemarie

dc.contributor.author

Ohnuma, Tetsu

dc.date.accessioned

2022-04-01T13:17:18Z

dc.date.available

2022-04-01T13:17:18Z

dc.date.issued

2021-06-01

dc.date.updated

2022-04-01T13:17:16Z

dc.description.abstract

Objective: To evaluate trends in the use of epidural analgesia and nonopioid and opioid analgesics for patients undergoing lobectomy from 2009 to 2018. Methods: We queried the Premier database for adult patients undergoing open, video-assisted, and robotic-assisted lobectomy from 2009 to 2018. The outcome of interest was changes in the receipt of epidural analgesia and nonopioid and opioid analgesics as measured by charges on the day of surgery. We also evaluated postoperative daily opioid use. We used multivariable logistic and linear regression models to examine the association between the utilization of each analgesic modality and year. Results: We identified 86,308 patients undergoing lobectomy from 2009 to 2018 within the Premier database: 35,818 (41.5%) patients had open lobectomy, 35,951 (41.7%) patients had video-assisted lobectomy, and 14,539 (16.8%) patients had robotic-assisted lobectomy. For all 3 surgical cohorts, epidural analgesia use decreased, and nonopioid analgesics use increased over time, except for intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Use of patient-controlled analgesia decreased, while opioid consumption on the day of surgery increased and postoperative opioid consumption did not decrease over time. Conclusions: In this large sample of patients undergoing lobectomy, utilization of epidural analgesia declined and use of nonopioid analgesics increased. Despite these changes, opioid consumption on day of surgery increased, and there was no significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption. Further research is warranted to examine the association of these changes with patient outcomes.

dc.identifier.issn

2666-2736

dc.identifier.issn

2666-2736

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24743

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

JTCVS Open

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.xjon.2021.03.015

dc.title

Changes in analgesic strategies for lobectomy from 2009 to 2018

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Raghunathan, Karthik|0000-0003-2809-5374

duke.contributor.orcid

Krishnamoorthy, Vijay|0000-0002-1365-4121|0000-0003-4153-2348

duke.contributor.orcid

Jawitz, Oliver K|0000-0002-4753-3897

duke.contributor.orcid

Ohnuma, Tetsu|0000-0002-2303-6802

pubs.begin-page

224

pubs.end-page

236

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, Cardiothoracic

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, VA Anesthesiology Service

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021 JTCVSopn analgesic strategies lobectomy Premier 2009-2018.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format