Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis.

Abstract

Introduction

Eculizumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG; REGAIN; NCT01997229). We report an interim analysis of an open-label extension of REGAIN, evaluating eculizumab's long-term safety and efficacy.

Methods

Eculizumab (1,200 mg every 2 weeks for 22.7 months [median]) was administered to 117 patients.

Results

The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with REGAIN; no cases of meningococcal infection were reported during the interim analysis period. Myasthenia gravis exacerbation rate was reduced by 75% from the year before REGAIN (P < 0.0001). Improvements with eculizumab in activities of daily living, muscle strength, functional ability, and quality of life in REGAIN were maintained through 3 years; 56% of patients achieved minimal manifestations or pharmacological remission. Patients who had received placebo during REGAIN experienced rapid and sustained improvements during open-label eculizumab (P < 0.0001).

Discussion

These findings provide evidence for the long-term safety and sustained efficacy of eculizumab for refractory gMG. Muscle Nerve 2019.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Regain Study Group, Humans, Meningococcal Infections, Aspergillosis, Myasthenia Gravis, Heart Diseases, Disease Progression, Meningococcal Vaccines, Treatment Outcome, Activities of Daily Living, Longitudinal Studies, Quality of Life, Adult, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Complement Inactivating Agents, Muscle Strength, Angioedema, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Injection Site Reaction

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1002/mus.26447

Publication Info

Muppidi, Srikanth, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Michael Benatar, Hiroyuki Murai, Richard J Barohn, Isabel Illa, Saiju Jacob, John Vissing, et al. (2019). Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis. Muscle & nerve, 60(1). pp. 14–24. 10.1002/mus.26447 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28445.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.