Digital Medicine System in Veterans With Severe Mental Illness: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

dc.contributor.author

Gonzales, Sarah

dc.contributor.author

Okusaga, Olaoluwa O

dc.contributor.author

Reuteman-Fowler, J Corey

dc.contributor.author

Oakes, Megan M

dc.contributor.author

Brown, Jamie N

dc.contributor.author

Moore, Scott

dc.contributor.author

Lewinski, Allison A

dc.contributor.author

Rodriguez, Cristin

dc.contributor.author

Moncayo, Norma

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Valerie A

dc.contributor.author

Malone, Shauna

dc.contributor.author

List, Justine

dc.contributor.author

Cho, Raymond Y

dc.contributor.author

Jeffreys, Amy S

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.date.accessioned

2023-08-09T14:39:46Z

dc.date.available

2023-08-09T14:39:46Z

dc.date.issued

2022-12

dc.date.updated

2023-08-09T14:39:46Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant problem for patients with serious mental illness. Measuring medication adherence through subjective and objective measures can be challenging, time-consuming, and inaccurate.

Objective

The primary purpose of this feasibility and acceptability study was to evaluate the impact of a digital medicine system (DMS) among Veterans (patients) with serious mental illness as compared with treatment as usual (TAU) on medication adherence.

Methods

This open-label, 2-site, provider-randomized trial assessed aripiprazole refill adherence in Veterans with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. We randomized 26 providers such that their patients either received TAU or DMS for a period of 90 days. Semistructured interviews with patients and providers were used to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the DMS.

Results

We enrolled 46 patients across 2 Veterans Health Administration sites: 21 (46%) in DMS and 25 (54%) in TAU. There was no difference in the proportion of days covered by medication refill over 3 and 6 months (0.82, SD 0.24 and 0.75, SD 0.26 in DMS vs 0.86, SD 0.19 and 0.82, SD 0.21 in TAU, respectively). The DMS arm had 0.85 (SD 0.20) proportion of days covered during the period they were engaged with the DMS (mean 144, SD 100 days). Interviews with patients (n=14) and providers (n=5) elicited themes salient to using the DMS. Patient findings described the positive impact of the DMS on medication adherence, challenges with the DMS patch connectivity and skin irritation, and challenges with the DMS app that affected overall use. Providers described an overall interest in using a DMS as an objective measure to support medication adherence in their patients. However, providers described challenges with the DMS dashboard and integrating DMS data into their workflow, which decreased the usability of the DMS for providers.

Conclusions

There was no observed difference in refill rates. Among those who engaged in the DMS arm, the proportion of days covered by refills were relatively high (mean 0.85, SD 0.20). The qualitative analyses highlighted areas for further refinement of the DMS.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03881449; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03881449.
dc.identifier

v6i12e34893

dc.identifier.issn

2561-326X

dc.identifier.issn

2561-326X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28693

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

dc.relation.ispartof

JMIR formative research

dc.relation.isversionof

10.2196/34893

dc.subject

ABILIFY MYCITE

dc.subject

Veterans

dc.subject

adherence

dc.subject

aripiprazole

dc.subject

digital medicine

dc.subject

medication

dc.subject

mental health

dc.subject

mental illness

dc.subject

mobile phone

dc.subject

qualitative methods

dc.title

Digital Medicine System in Veterans With Severe Mental Illness: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Lewinski, Allison A|0000-0002-1356-1857

duke.contributor.orcid

Smith, Valerie A|0000-0001-5170-9819

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

pubs.begin-page

e34893

pubs.issue

12

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Adult Psychiatry & Psychology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Digital Medicine System in Veterans With Severe Mental Illness Feasibility and Acceptability Study.pdf
Size:
387.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version