Effect of a Coaching Intervention to Improve Cardiologist Communication: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

dc.contributor.author

Pollak, Kathryn I

dc.contributor.author

Olsen, Maren K

dc.contributor.author

Yang, Hongqiu

dc.contributor.author

Prose, Neil

dc.contributor.author

Jackson, Larry R

dc.contributor.author

Pinheiro, Sandro O

dc.contributor.author

Dunbar, T Kayla

dc.contributor.author

Johnson, Kimberly S

dc.date.accessioned

2023-05-01T13:22:15Z

dc.date.available

2023-05-01T13:22:15Z

dc.date.issued

2023-04

dc.date.updated

2023-05-01T13:22:14Z

dc.description.abstract

Importance

Communication between cardiologists and patients can significantly affect patient comprehension, adherence, and satisfaction. To our knowledge, a coaching intervention to improve cardiologist communication has not been tested.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a communication coaching intervention to teach evidence-based communication skills to cardiologists.

Design, setting, and participants

This 2-arm randomized clinical trial was performed at outpatient cardiology clinics at an academic medical center and affiliated community clinics, and from February 2019 through March 2020 recruited 40 cardiologists and audio recorded 161 patients in the preintervention phase and 240 in the postintervention phase. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to January 2023.

Interventions

Half of the cardiologists were randomized to receive a coaching intervention that involved three 1:1 sessions, 2 of which included feedback on their audio-recorded encounters. Communication coaches taught 5 skills derived from motivational interviewing: (1) sitting down and making eye contact with all in the room, (2) open-ended questions, (3) reflective statements, (4) empathic statements, and (5) "What questions do you have?"

Main outcomes and measures

Coders unaware of study arm coded these behaviors in the preintervention and postintervention audio-recorded encounters (objective communication). Patients completed a survey after the visit to report perceptions of communication quality (subjective communication).

Results

Analysis included 40 cardiologists (mean [SD] age, 47 [9] years; 7 female and 33 male) and 240 patients in the postintervention phase (mean [SD] age, 58 [15] years; 122 female, 118 male). When controlling for preintervention behaviors, cardiologists in the intervention vs control arm were more likely to make empathic statements (intervention: 52 of 117 [44%] vs control: 31 of 113 [27%]; P = .05); to ask, "What questions do you have?" (26 of 117 [22%] vs 6 of 113 [5%]; P = .002); and to respond with empathy when patients expressed negative emotions (mean ratio of empathic responses to empathic opportunities, 0.50 vs 0.20; P = .004). These effects did not vary based on patient or cardiologist race or sex. We found no arm differences for open-ended questions or reflective statements and were unable to assess differences in patient ratings due to ceiling effects.

Conclusions and relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, a communication coaching intervention improved 2 key communication behaviors: expressing empathy and eliciting questions. Empathic communication is a harder-level skill that may improve the patient experience and information comprehension. Future work should explore how best to assess the effect of communication coaching on patient perceptions of care and clinical outcomes and determine its effectiveness in larger, more diverse samples of cardiologists.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03464110.
dc.identifier

2803779

dc.identifier.issn

2168-6106

dc.identifier.issn

2168-6114

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27247

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

dc.relation.ispartof

JAMA internal medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0629

dc.title

Effect of a Coaching Intervention to Improve Cardiologist Communication: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Olsen, Maren K|0000-0002-9540-2103

duke.contributor.orcid

Jackson, Larry R|0000-0002-0195-1081

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JAMA IM_Reach outcomes_ Pollak_2023_oi_230014_1680788135.40829.pdf
Size:
264.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format