Validation of ICDPIC software injury severity scores using a large regional trauma registry.

dc.contributor.author

Greene, Nathaniel H

dc.contributor.author

Kernic, Mary A

dc.contributor.author

Vavilala, Monica S

dc.contributor.author

Rivara, Frederick P

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2015-05-26T19:00:11Z

dc.date.issued

2015-10

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Administrative or quality improvement registries may or may not contain the elements needed for investigations by trauma researchers. International Classification of Diseases Program for Injury Categorisation (ICDPIC), a statistical program available through Stata, is a powerful tool that can extract injury severity scores from ICD-9-CM codes. We conducted a validation study for use of the ICDPIC in trauma research. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort validation study of 40,418 patients with injury using a large regional trauma registry. ICDPIC-generated AIS scores for each body region were compared with trauma registry AIS scores (gold standard) in adult and paediatric populations. A separate analysis was conducted among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) comparing the ICDPIC tool with ICD-9-CM embedded severity codes. Performance in characterising overall injury severity, by the ISS, was also assessed. RESULTS: The ICDPIC tool generated substantial correlations in thoracic and abdominal trauma (weighted κ 0.87-0.92), and in head and neck trauma (weighted κ 0.76-0.83). The ICDPIC tool captured TBI severity better than ICD-9-CM code embedded severity and offered the advantage of generating a severity value for every patient (rather than having missing data). Its ability to produce an accurate severity score was consistent within each body region as well as overall. CONCLUSIONS: The ICDPIC tool performs well in classifying injury severity and is superior to ICD-9-CM embedded severity for TBI. Use of ICDPIC demonstrates substantial efficiency and may be a preferred tool in determining injury severity for large trauma datasets, provided researchers understand its limitations and take caution when examining smaller trauma datasets.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25985974

dc.identifier

injuryprev-2014-041524

dc.identifier.eissn

1475-5785

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10182

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

BMJ

dc.relation.ispartof

Inj Prev

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041524

dc.subject

Injury Diagnosis

dc.subject

Abbreviated Injury Scale

dc.subject

Area Under Curve

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Forms and Records Control

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Injury Severity Score

dc.subject

International Classification of Diseases

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

dc.subject

Quality Improvement

dc.subject

Registries

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Software

dc.subject

Wounds and Injuries

dc.title

Validation of ICDPIC software injury severity scores using a large regional trauma registry.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Greene, Nathaniel H|0000-0003-0230-0499

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25985974

pubs.begin-page

325

pubs.end-page

330

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, Pediatrics

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

21

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
injuryprev-2014-041524-NGedits.pdf
Size:
927.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version