Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

6
views
7
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

At the college level, the effectiveness of active-learning interventions is typically measured at the broadest scales: the achievement or retention of all students in a course. Coarse-grained measures like these cannot inform instructors about an intervention's relative effectiveness for the different student populations in their classrooms or about the proximate factors responsible for the observed changes in student achievement. In this study, we disaggregate student data by racial/ethnic groups and first-generation status to identify whether a particular intervention-increased course structure-works better for particular populations of students. We also explore possible factors that may mediate the observed changes in student achievement. We found that a "moderate-structure" intervention increased course performance for all student populations, but worked disproportionately well for black students-halving the black-white achievement gap-and first-generation students-closing the achievement gap with continuing-generation students. We also found that students consistently reported completing the assigned readings more frequently, spending more time studying for class, and feeling an increased sense of community in the moderate-structure course. These changes imply that increased course structure improves student achievement at least partially through increasing student use of distributed learning and creating a more interdependent classroom community.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

Publication Info

Eddy, Sarah L, and Kelly A Hogan (2014). Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work?. CBE life sciences education, 13(3). pp. 453–468. 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28695.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.