Effectiveness of psychological treatments for depression and alcohol use disorder delivered by community-based counsellors: two pragmatic randomised controlled trials within primary healthcare in Nepal.

dc.contributor.author

Jordans, Mark JD

dc.contributor.author

Luitel, Nagendra P

dc.contributor.author

Garman, Emily

dc.contributor.author

Kohrt, Brandon A

dc.contributor.author

Rathod, Sujit D

dc.contributor.author

Shrestha, Pragya

dc.contributor.author

Komproe, Ivan H

dc.contributor.author

Lund, Crick

dc.contributor.author

Patel, Vikram

dc.date.accessioned

2019-02-01T14:40:38Z

dc.date.available

2019-02-01T14:40:38Z

dc.date.issued

2019-01-25

dc.date.updated

2019-02-01T14:40:37Z

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:Evidence shows benefits of psychological treatments in low-resource countries, yet few government health systems include psychological services.AimEvaluating the clinical value of adding psychological treatments, delivered by community-based counsellors, to primary care-based mental health services for depression and alcohol use disorder (AUD), as recommended by the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). METHOD:Two randomised controlled trials, separately for depression and AUD, were carried out. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to mental healthcare delivered by mhGAP-trained primary care workers (psychoeducation and psychotropic medicines when indicated), or the same services plus individual psychological treatments (Healthy Activity Program for depression and Counselling for Alcohol Problems). Primary outcomes were symptom severity, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 item (PHQ-9) for depression and the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test for AUD, and functional impairment, measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), at 12 months post-enrolment. RESULTS:Participants with depression in the intervention arm (n = 60) had greater reduction in PHQ-9 and WHODAS scores compared with participants in the control (n = 60) (PHQ-9: M = -5.90, 95% CI -7.55 to -4.25, β = -3.68, 95% CI -5.68 to -1.67, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.66; WHODAS: M = -12.21, 95% CI -19.58 to -4.84, β = -10.74, 95% CI -19.96 to -1.53, P= 0.022, Cohen's d = 0.42). For the AUD trial, no significant effect was found when comparing control (n = 80) and intervention participants (n = 82). CONCLUSION:Adding a psychological treatment delivered by community-based counsellors increases treatment effects for depression compared with only mhGAP-based services by primary health workers 12 months post-treatment.Declaration of interestNone.

dc.identifier

S0007125018003008

dc.identifier.issn

0007-1250

dc.identifier.issn

1472-1465

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17936

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

dc.relation.ispartof

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1192/bjp.2018.300

dc.subject

Nepal

dc.subject

Psychological treatment

dc.subject

effectiveness

dc.subject

low- and middle-income settings

dc.subject

primary healthcare

dc.title

Effectiveness of psychological treatments for depression and alcohol use disorder delivered by community-based counsellors: two pragmatic randomised controlled trials within primary healthcare in Nepal.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

1

pubs.end-page

9

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Social and Community Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jordans et al 2019_BJP_Effectiveness of counseling in Nepal.pdf
Size:
424.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version