"Thinking too much": A systematic review of a common idiom of distress.

dc.contributor.author

Kaiser, Bonnie N

dc.contributor.author

Haroz, Emily E

dc.contributor.author

Kohrt, Brandon A

dc.contributor.author

Bolton, Paul A

dc.contributor.author

Bass, Judith K

dc.contributor.author

Hinton, Devon E

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2015-12-03T14:14:49Z

dc.date.issued

2015-12

dc.description.abstract

Idioms of distress communicate suffering via reference to shared ethnopsychologies, and better understanding of idioms of distress can contribute to effective clinical and public health communication. This systematic review is a qualitative synthesis of "thinking too much" idioms globally, to determine their applicability and variability across cultures. We searched eight databases and retained publications if they included empirical quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research regarding a "thinking too much" idiom and were in English. In total, 138 publications from 1979 to 2014 met inclusion criteria. We examined the descriptive epidemiology, phenomenology, etiology, and course of "thinking too much" idioms and compared them to psychiatric constructs. "Thinking too much" idioms typically reference ruminative, intrusive, and anxious thoughts and result in a range of perceived complications, physical and mental illnesses, or even death. These idioms appear to have variable overlap with common psychiatric constructs, including depression, anxiety, and PTSD. However, "thinking too much" idioms reflect aspects of experience, distress, and social positioning not captured by psychiatric diagnoses and often show wide within-cultural variation, in addition to between-cultural differences. Taken together, these findings suggest that "thinking too much" should not be interpreted as a gloss for psychiatric disorder nor assumed to be a unitary symptom or syndrome within a culture. We suggest five key ways in which engagement with "thinking too much" idioms can improve global mental health research and interventions: it (1) incorporates a key idiom of distress into measurement and screening to improve validity of efforts at identifying those in need of services and tracking treatment outcomes; (2) facilitates exploration of ethnopsychology in order to bolster cultural appropriateness of interventions; (3) strengthens public health communication to encourage engagement in treatment; (4) reduces stigma by enhancing understanding, promoting treatment-seeking, and avoiding unintentionally contributing to stigmatization; and (5) identifies a key locally salient treatment target.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584235

dc.identifier

S0277-9536(15)30183-0

dc.identifier.eissn

1873-5347

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10953

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Soc Sci Med

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.044

dc.subject

Anxiety

dc.subject

Cultural concept of distress

dc.subject

Depression

dc.subject

Ethnopsychology

dc.subject

Global mental health

dc.subject

Idiom of distress

dc.subject

PTSD

dc.subject

Transcultural psychiatry

dc.subject

Anxiety

dc.subject

Culture

dc.subject

Depression

dc.subject

Ethnopsychology

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Language

dc.subject

Mental Health

dc.subject

Stress, Psychological

dc.subject

Thinking

dc.title

"Thinking too much": A systematic review of a common idiom of distress.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584235

pubs.begin-page

170

pubs.end-page

183

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Cultural Anthropology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Social and Community Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

147

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kaiser et al_2015_SocialScienceMedicine_Thinking Too Much Systematic Review.pdf
Size:
758.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version