Accuracy of Noise Magnitude Measurements from Patient CT Images

dc.contributor.author

Ria, Francesco

dc.contributor.author

Setiawan, Hananiel

dc.contributor.author

Abadi, Ehsan

dc.contributor.author

Samei, Ehsan

dc.date.accessioned

2023-09-06T13:49:57Z

dc.date.available

2023-09-06T13:49:57Z

dc.date.issued

2023-07-23

dc.date.updated

2023-09-06T13:49:56Z

dc.description.abstract

Purpose Noise magnitude is a main CT image quality indicator. In vivo measurements emerged as a patient-specific methodology to assess and qualify CT noise, yet methods to do so vary. Current noise measurement methods in soft tissues and air surrounding the patient use distinct image segmentations, HU thresholds, and region-of-interests, resulting in noise estimation variations. In this study, we compared two noise magnitude calculation methods against the gold standard ensemble noise in two cohorts of virtually-generated patient images across 36 imaging conditions. Methods 1800 image datasets were generated using a virtual trial platform based on anthropomorphic phantoms (XCAT) and a validated, scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim). XCAT phantoms were repeatedly imaged 50 times using Chest and Abdominopelvic protocols, three dose levels, and three reconstruction kernels, using both FBP and IR algorithms. Noise magnitudes were calculated in the air surrounding the patient (An) and soft tissues (GNI) by applying HU<-900 and -300<HU<100 thresholds, respectively. Per each imaging condition, An and GNI were compared to the ensemble noise calculated in soft tissue (En) and to the ensemble noise calculated in the liver and in the lungs (On) for abdominopelvic and chest studies, respectively. Results Across the three kernels and dose levels, An largely underestimated En and On for both FBP (median differences: -46% and -49%) and IR (median differences: -49% and -51%); whereas the GNI showed closer values to the En and On for FBP (median differences: 4% and 3%) and IR (median differences: -3% and -8%). Conclusion Applying virtual imaging techniques enabled an unbiased comparison of different noise magnitude calculation methods in large and realistic populations simulating clinical conditions. The noise measured in the air surrounding the patient cannot represent noise magnitude in soft tissues. The results affirmed the validation of soft tissue-based noise measurements as a close surrogate to inform protocol design and technology assessment.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28975

dc.relation.ispartof

https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.16525

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1002/mp.16525

dc.title

Accuracy of Noise Magnitude Measurements from Patient CT Images

dc.type

Conference

duke.contributor.orcid

Ria, Francesco|0000-0001-5902-7396

duke.contributor.orcid

Abadi, Ehsan|0000-0002-9123-5854

duke.contributor.orcid

Samei, Ehsan|0000-0001-7451-3309

pubs.begin-page

E130

pubs.end-page

E131

pubs.issue

6

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Radiology

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

50

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AAPM_2023_noise_methods_abstract_ria.pdf
Size:
182.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version