Implementation mapping for tobacco cessation in a federally qualified health center.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author

Domlyn, Ariel M

dc.contributor.author

Crowder, Carolyn

dc.contributor.author

Eisenson, Howard

dc.contributor.author

Pollak, Kathryn I

dc.contributor.author

Davis, James M

dc.contributor.author

Calhoun, Patrick S

dc.contributor.author

Wilson, Sarah M

dc.date.accessioned

2022-12-01T15:49:19Z

dc.date.available

2022-12-01T15:49:19Z

dc.date.issued

2022-01

dc.date.updated

2022-12-01T15:49:18Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Implementation mapping (IM) is a promising five-step method for guiding planning, execution, and maintenance of an innovation. Case examples are valuable for implementation practitioners to understand considerations for applying IM. This pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility of using IM within a federally qualified health center (FQHC) with limited funds and a 1-year timeline.

Methods

An urban FQHC partnered with an academic team to employ IM for implementing a computerized strategy of tobacco cessation: the 5A's (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange). Each step of IM was supplemented with theory-driven methods and frameworks. Data collection included surveys and interviews with clinic staff, analyzed via rapid data analysis.

Results

Medical assistants and clinicians were identified as primary implementers of the 5A's intervention. Salient determinants of change included the perceived compatibility and relative priority of 5A's. Performance objectives and change objectives were derived to address these determinants, along with a suite of implementation strategies. Despite indicators of adoptability and acceptability of the 5A's, reductions in willingness to adopt the implementation package occurred over time and the intervention was not adopted by the FQHC within the study timeframe. This is likely due to the strain of the COVID-19 pandemic altering health clinic priorities.

Conclusions

Administratively, the five IM steps are feasible to conduct with FQHC staff within 1 year. However, this study did not obtain its intended outcomes. Lessons learned include the importance of re-assessing barriers over time and ensuring a longer timeframe to observe implementation outcomes.
dc.identifier.issn

2296-2565

dc.identifier.issn

2296-2565

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26274

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Frontiers Media SA

dc.relation.ispartof

Frontiers in public health

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3389/fpubh.2022.908646

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Pilot Projects

dc.subject

Tobacco Use Cessation

dc.subject

Smoking Cessation

dc.subject

Pandemics

dc.subject

COVID-19

dc.title

Implementation mapping for tobacco cessation in a federally qualified health center.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Davis, James M|0000-0002-7196-5649

duke.contributor.orcid

Wilson, Sarah M|0000-0002-1028-6028

pubs.begin-page

908646

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Implementation mapping for tobacco cessation in a federally qualified health center.pdf
Size:
877.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Scholarly Articles