Older parents enjoy better filial piety and care from daughters than sons in China.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

604
views
168
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

This study analyzes the unique datasets of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey using logistic regression and controlling for various covariates. Our analyses clearly demonstrate that disabled older parents are more satisfied with care provided by daughters than sons and that older parents enjoy greater filial piety from and better relationships with daughters than sons. The daughter-advantages of enjoying greater filial piety from and better relationships with children are stronger among the oldest-old aged 80+ than the young-old aged 65-79, and surprisingly more profound in rural areas than urban areas, while son-preference is much more prevalent among rural residents. We also discuss why China's rigorous fertility policy until October-2015 and much less-developed pension system in rural areas substantially contribute to sustaining traditional son-preference and a high sex ratio at birth (SRB) when fertility is low. We recommend China take integrative public health policy actions of informing the public that having daughter(s) is beneficial for old age care, developing the rural pension system and implementing the universal two-child policy as soon as possible. We believe that these policy actions would help to reduce son-preference, bring down the high SRB, and enable more future elderly parents to enjoy better care from their children and healthier lives.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.22381/AJMR3120169

Publication Info

Yi, Zeng, Linda George, Melanie Sereny, Danan Gu and James W Vaupel (2016). Older parents enjoy better filial piety and care from daughters than sons in China. Am J Med Res (N Y), 3(1). pp. 244–272. 10.22381/AJMR3120169 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14744.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.