Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi.

dc.contributor.author

Chokotho, Linda

dc.contributor.author

Donnelley, Claire A

dc.contributor.author

Young, Sven

dc.contributor.author

Lau, Brian C

dc.contributor.author

Wu, Hao-Hua

dc.contributor.author

Mkandawire, Nyengo

dc.contributor.author

Gjertsen, Jan-Erik

dc.contributor.author

Hallan, Geir

dc.contributor.author

Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J

dc.contributor.author

Shearer, David

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-31T19:19:01Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-31T19:19:01Z

dc.date.issued

2021-08

dc.description.abstract

Background and purpose - In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST.Patients and methods - This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty.Results - Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71-0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer's perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective.Interpretation - IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources.

dc.identifier.issn

1745-3674

dc.identifier.issn

1745-3682

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29924

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Medical Journals Sweden AB

dc.relation.ispartof

Acta orthopaedica

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1080/17453674.2021.1897927

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Femoral Fractures

dc.subject

Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary

dc.subject

Traction

dc.subject

Bone Nails

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Cost-Benefit Analysis

dc.subject

Malawi

dc.title

Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

436

pubs.end-page

442

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

92

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in.pdf
Size:
353.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format