Determining the best vertebra for measuring pelvic incidence and spinopelvic parameters in adult spinal deformity patients with transitional anatomy.

dc.contributor.author

Ani, Fares

dc.contributor.author

Protopsaltis, Themistocles S

dc.contributor.author

Parekh, Yesha

dc.contributor.author

Odeh, Khalid

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Eastlack, Robert K

dc.contributor.author

Lenke, Lawrence

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, Frank

dc.contributor.author

Mundis, Gregory M

dc.contributor.author

Gupta, Munish C

dc.contributor.author

Klineberg, Eric O

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Hart, Robert

dc.contributor.author

Burton, Douglas

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher P

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.date.accessioned

2023-11-02T11:23:05Z

dc.date.available

2023-11-02T11:23:05Z

dc.date.issued

2023-10

dc.date.updated

2023-11-02T11:23:01Z

dc.description.abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine if spinal deformity patients with L5 sacralization should have pelvic incidence (PI) and other spinopelvic parameters measured from the L5 or S1 endplate.

Methods

This study was a multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study comprising a large database of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and a database of asymptomatic individuals. Linear regression modeling was used to determine normative T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and PI - lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch (PI-LL) based on PI and age in a database of asymptomatic subjects. In an ASD database, patients with radiographic evidence of L5 sacralization had the PI, LL, and TPA measured from the superior endplate of S1 and then also from L5. The differences in TPA and PI-LL from normative were calculated in the sacralization cohort relative to L5 and S1 and correlated to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patients were grouped based on the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab PI-LL modifier (0, +, or ++) using the L5 PI-LL and S1 PI-LL. Baseline ODI and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores were compared across and within groups.

Results

Among 1179 ASD patients, 276 (23.4%) had transitional anatomy, 176 with sacralized L5 (14.9%) and 100 (8.48%) with lumbarization of S1. The 176 patients with sacralized L5 were analyzed. When measured using the L5 superior endplate, pelvic parameters were significantly smaller than those measured relative to S1 (PI: 24.5° ± 11.0° vs 55.7° ± 12.0°, p = 0.001;TPA: 11.2° ± 12.0° vs 20.3° ± 12.5°, p = 0.001; and PI-LL: 0.67° ± 21.1° vs 11.4° ± 20.8°, p = 0.001). When measured from S1, 76 (43%), 45 (25.6%), and 55 (31.3%) patients had SRS-Schwab PI-LL modifiers of 0, +, and ++, respectively, compared with 124 (70.5%), 22 (12.5%), and 30 (17.0%), respectively, when measured from L5. There were significant differences in ODI and PCS scores as the SRS-Schwab grade increased regardless of L5 or S1 measurement. The L5 group had lower PCS functional scores for SRS-Schwab modifiers 0 and ++ relative to same grades in the S1 group. Offset from normative TPA (0.5° ± 11.1° vs 9.6° ± 10.8°, p = 0.001) and PI-LL (4.5° ± 20.4° vs 15.2° ± 19.3°, p = 0.001) were smaller when measuring from L5. Moreover, S1 measurements were more correlated with health status by ODI (TPA offset from normative: S1, R = 0.326 vs L5, R = 0.285; PI-LL offset from normative: S1, R = 0.318 vs L5, R = 0.274).

Conclusions

Measuring the PI and spinopelvic parameters at L5 in sacralized anatomy results in underestimating spinal deformity and is less correlated with health-related quality of life. Surgeons may consider measuring PI and spinopelvic parameters relative to S1 rather than at L5 in patients with a sacralized L5.
dc.identifier.issn

1547-5654

dc.identifier.issn

1547-5646

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29330

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3171/2023.8.spine23432

dc.subject

pelvic incidence

dc.subject

sacral deformity

dc.subject

sacralized L5

dc.subject

spine deformity

dc.subject

transitional anatomy

dc.title

Determining the best vertebra for measuring pelvic incidence and spinopelvic parameters in adult spinal deformity patients with transitional anatomy.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

1

pubs.end-page

7

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
j-neurosurg-spine-article-10.3171-2023.8.SPINE23432.pdf
Size:
4.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format