Outcomes of metallic stents for malignant ureteral obstruction.

dc.contributor.author

Goldsmith, Zachariah G

dc.contributor.author

Wang, Agnes J

dc.contributor.author

Bañez, Lionel L

dc.contributor.author

Lipkin, Michael E

dc.contributor.author

Ferrandino, Michael N

dc.contributor.author

Preminger, Glenn M

dc.contributor.author

Inman, Brant A

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2013-05-14T16:29:13Z

dc.date.accessioned

2013-05-14T16:29:44Z

dc.date.issued

2012-09

dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: Malignant ureteral obstruction often necessitates chronic urinary diversion and is associated with high rates of failure with traditional ureteral stents. We evaluated the outcomes of a metallic stent placed for malignant ureteral obstruction and determined the impact of risk factors previously associated with increased failure rates of traditional stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing placement of the metallic Resonance® stent for malignant ureteral obstruction at an academic referral center were identified retrospectively. Stent failure was defined as unplanned stent exchange or nephrostomy tube placement for signs or symptoms of recurrent ureteral obstruction (recurrent hydroureteronephrosis or increasing creatinine). Predictors of time to stent failure were assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 37 stents were placed in 25 patients with malignant ureteral obstruction. Of these stents 12 (35%) were identified to fail. Progressive hydroureteronephrosis and increasing creatinine were the most common signs of stent failure. Three failed stents had migrated distally and no stents required removal for recurrent infection. Patients with evidence of prostate cancer invading the bladder at stent placement were found to have a significantly increased risk of failure (HR 6.50, 95% CI 1.45-29.20, p = 0.015). Notably symptomatic subcapsular hematomas were identified in 3 patients after metallic stent placement. CONCLUSIONS: Failure rates with a metallic stent are similar to those historically observed with traditional polyurethane based stents in malignant ureteral obstruction. The invasion of prostate cancer in the bladder significantly increases the risk of failure. Patients should be counseled and observed for subcapsular hematoma formation with this device.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22819410

dc.identifier

S0022-5347(12)03670-1

dc.identifier.eissn

1527-3792

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7365

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

J Urol

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.113

dc.relation.replaces

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7364

dc.relation.replaces

10161/7364

dc.subject

Abdominal Neoplasms

dc.subject

Chromium Alloys

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Molybdenum

dc.subject

Prosthesis Design

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Stents

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Ureteral Obstruction

dc.title

Outcomes of metallic stents for malignant ureteral obstruction.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22819410

pubs.begin-page

851

pubs.end-page

855

pubs.issue

3

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Urology

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

188

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Goldsmith JU 2012.pdf
Size:
763.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format