A Bayesian network meta-analysis of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins and ezetimibe with or without statins for cardiovascular outcomes

dc.contributor.author

Khan, Safi U

dc.contributor.author

Talluri, Swapna

dc.contributor.author

Riaz, Haris

dc.contributor.author

Rahman, Hammad

dc.contributor.author

Nasir, Fahad

dc.contributor.author

Bin Riaz, Irbaz

dc.contributor.author

Sattur, Sudhakar

dc.contributor.author

Ahmed, Haitham

dc.contributor.author

Kaluski, Edo

dc.contributor.author

Krasuski, Richard

dc.date.accessioned

2019-02-01T14:47:55Z

dc.date.available

2019-02-01T14:47:55Z

dc.date.issued

2018-05-01

dc.date.updated

2019-02-01T14:47:54Z

dc.description.abstract

© 2018, © The European Society of Cardiology 2018. Background: The comparative effects of statins, ezetimibe with or without statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors remain unassessed. Design: Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare treatment groups. Methods: Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials were selected using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (inception – September 2017). Results: In network meta-analysis of 189,116 patients, PCSK9 inhibitors were ranked as the best treatment for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (Surface Under Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA), 85%), myocardial infarction (SUCRA, 84%) and stroke (SUCRA, 80%). PCSK9 inhibitors reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with ezetimibe + statin (odds ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.55–0.95; Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria: moderate), statin (OR: 0.78; 95% CrI: 0.62–0.97; GRADE: moderate) and placebo (OR: 0.63; 95% CrI: 0.49–0.79; GRADE: high). The PCSK9 inhibitors were consistently superior to groups for major adverse cardiovascular event reduction in secondary prevention trials (SUCRA, 95%). Statins had the highest probability of having lowest rates of all-cause mortality (SUCRA, 82%) and cardiovascular mortality (SUCRA, 84%). Compared with placebo, statins reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CrI: 0.83–0.94; GRADE: moderate) and cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.84; 95% CrI: 0.77–0.90; GRADE: high). For cardiovascular mortality, PCSK9 inhibitors were ranked as the second best treatment (SUCRA, 78%) followed by ezetimibe + statin (SUCRA, 50%). Conclusion: PCSK9 inhibitors were ranked as the most effective treatment for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and stroke, without having major safety concerns. Statins were ranked as the most effective therapy for reducing mortality.

dc.identifier.issn

2047-4873

dc.identifier.issn

2047-4881

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17951

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/2047487318766612

dc.title

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins and ezetimibe with or without statins for cardiovascular outcomes

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Krasuski, Richard|0000-0003-3150-5215

pubs.begin-page

844

pubs.end-page

853

pubs.issue

8

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

25

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PCSK9 Haris.pdf
Size:
772.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format