Reevaluating Anti-Pornography Arguments: Definitions and Ramifications

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2024

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

6
views
126
downloads

Abstract

In this essay, I reexamine the anti-pornography argument put forward by feminist scholars such as Catherine MacKinnon and Rae Langton in the contemporary context from a culturally distinctive perspective. In my analysis, I take issue with two problems in the anti-pornography argument: its arbitrary distinction between pornography and erotica, and its oversight of how the regulation of pornography could potentially reinforce women’s subordination. As such, I conclude that the regulation of pornography is neither pragmatic given its prevalent digital distribution in the contemporary world, nor beneficial to its cause. As an alternative, I propose that we open to the possibility of feminist pornography, which potentially enables women to express their sexuality and regain control of their bodies.

Description

Provenance

Citation

Citation

Wang, Junyu (2024). Reevaluating Anti-Pornography Arguments: Definitions and Ramifications. Master's thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31057.

Collections


Except where otherwise noted, student scholarship that was shared on DukeSpace after 2009 is made available to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial / No derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license. All rights in student work shared on DukeSpace before 2009 remain with the author and/or their designee, whose permission may be required for reuse.