Frail patients require instrumentation of a more proximal vertebra for a successful outcome after surgery for adult spine deformity.

dc.contributor.author

Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O

dc.contributor.author

Jankowski, Pawel P

dc.contributor.author

Das, Ankita

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Passias, Peter G

dc.date.accessioned

2024-12-05T15:48:57Z

dc.date.available

2024-12-05T15:48:57Z

dc.date.issued

2024-11

dc.description.abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the level of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in frail patients undergoing surgery for adult spine deformity (ASD).

Methods

Patients with adult spinal deformity who had undergone T9-to-pelvis fusion were stratified using the ASD-Modified Frailty Index into not frail, frail, and severely frail categories. ASD was defined as at least one of: scoliosis ≥ 20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥ 5 cm, or pelvic tilt ≥ 25°. Means comparisons tests were used to assess differences between both groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze associations between frailty categories, UIV, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 477 patients were included (mean age 60.3 years (SD 14.9), mean BMI 27.5 kg/m2 (SD 5.8), mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 1.67 (SD 1.66)). Overall, 74% of patients were female (n = 353), and 49.6% of patients were not frail (237), 35.4% frail (n = 169), and 15% severely frail (n = 71). At baseline, differences in age, BMI, CCI, and deformity were significant (all p = 0.001). Overall, 15.5% of patients (n = 74) had experienced mechanical complications by two years (8.1% not frail (n = 36), 15.1% frail (n = 26), and 16.3% severely frail (n = 12); p = 0.013). Reoperations also differed between groups (20.2% (n = 48) vs 23.3% (n = 39) vs 32.6% (n = 23); p = 0.011). Controlling for osteoporosis, baseline deformity, and degree of correction (by sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) matching), frail and severely frail patients were more likely to experience mechanical complications if they had heart failure (odds ratio (OR) 6.6 (95% CI 1.6 to 26.7); p = 0.008), depression (OR 5.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 25.7); p = 0.048), or cancer (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.4); p = 0.004). Frail and severely frail patients experienced higher rates of mechanical complication than 'not frail' patients at two years (19% (n = 45) vs 11.9% (n = 29); p = 0.003). When controlling for baseline deformity and degree of correction in severely frail and frail patients, severely frail patients were less likely to experience clinically relevant proximal junctional kyphosis or failure or mechanical complications by two years, if they had a more proximal UIV.

Conclusion

Frail patients are at risk of a poor outcome after surgery for adult spinal deformity due to their comorbidities. Although a definitively prescriptive upper instrumented vertebra remains elusive, these patients appear to be at greater risk for a poor outcome if the upper instrumented vertebra is sited more distally.
dc.identifier

BJJ-2024-0369.R2

dc.identifier.issn

2049-4394

dc.identifier.issn

2049-4408

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31727

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

dc.relation.ispartof

The bone & joint journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1302/0301-620x.106b11.bjj-2024-0369.r2

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Thoracic Vertebrae

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Scoliosis

dc.subject

Postoperative Complications

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Frail Elderly

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Frailty

dc.title

Frail patients require instrumentation of a more proximal vertebra for a successful outcome after surgery for adult spine deformity.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

duke.contributor.orcid

Passias, Peter G|0000-0002-1479-4070|0000-0003-2635-2226

pubs.begin-page

1342

pubs.end-page

1347

pubs.issue

11

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

106-B

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0301-620X.106B11.BJJ-2024-0369.R2.pdf
Size:
365.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format