Achievement and Maintenance of Optimal Alignment After Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery: A 5-Year Outcome Analysis.

dc.contributor.author

Mir, Jamshaid M

dc.contributor.author

Galetta, Matthew S

dc.contributor.author

Tretiakov, Peter

dc.contributor.author

Dave, Pooja

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Schoenfeld, Andrew J

dc.contributor.author

Passias, Peter G

dc.date.accessioned

2024-12-05T17:31:43Z

dc.date.available

2024-12-05T17:31:43Z

dc.date.issued

2023-12

dc.description.abstract

Objective

We sought to assess factors contributing to optimal radiographic outcomes.

Methods

Operative adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with baseline and 5-year (5Y) data were included. Optimal alignment (O) was defined as improving in at least 1 Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab modifier without worsening in any Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab modifier. A robust outcome was defined as having optimal alignment 2 years (2Y) post operation that was maintained at 5Y. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariate regression analysis, with a conditional inference tree for continuous variables.

Results

Two-hundred and ninety-seven ASD patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients (77.4%) met O at 6W, which decreased to 54.2% at 2Y. The majority of patients (89.4%) that met O at 2Y went on to meet radiographic durability at 5Y (48.5% of total cohort). Rates of junctional failure were higher in O2+5- compared with O2+5- (P = 0.013), with reoperation rates of 17.2% due to loss of alignment. Multivariable regression identified the following independent predictors of optimal alignment at 5Y in those that had O at 2Y: inadequate correction of pelvic tilt and overcorrection of the difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (P < 0.05). Increased age, body mass index, and invasiveness were the most significant nonradiographic predictors for not achieving 5Y durability (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The durability of optimal alignment after ASD corrective surgery was seen in about half of the patients at 5Y. While the majority of patients at 2Y maintained their radiographic outcomes at 5Y, major contributors to loss of alignment included junctional failure and adjacent region compensation, with only a minority of patients losing correction through the existing construct. The reoperation rate for loss of alignment was 17.2%. Loss of alignment requiring reoperation had a detrimental effect on 5Y clinical outcomes.
dc.identifier

S1878-8750(23)01376-1

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8750

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8769

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31764

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

World neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.106

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Lordosis

dc.subject

Scoliosis

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Reoperation

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Quality of Life

dc.subject

Adult

dc.title

Achievement and Maintenance of Optimal Alignment After Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery: A 5-Year Outcome Analysis.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Passias, Peter G|0000-0002-1479-4070|0000-0003-2635-2226

pubs.begin-page

e523

pubs.end-page

e527

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

180

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1878875023013761-main.pdf
Size:
252.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format