Effectiveness of Acute Care Remote Triage Systems: a Systematic Review.

dc.contributor.author

Boggan, Joel C

dc.contributor.author

Shoup, John Paul

dc.contributor.author

Whited, John D

dc.contributor.author

Van Voorhees, Elizabeth

dc.contributor.author

Gordon, Adelaide M

dc.contributor.author

Rushton, Sharron

dc.contributor.author

Lewinski, Allison A

dc.contributor.author

Tabriz, Amir A

dc.contributor.author

Adam, Soheir

dc.contributor.author

Fulton, Jessica

dc.contributor.author

Kosinski, Andrzej S

dc.contributor.author

Van Noord, Megan G

dc.contributor.author

Williams, John W

dc.contributor.author

Goldstein, Karen M

dc.contributor.author

Gierisch, Jennifer M

dc.date.accessioned

2021-06-02T20:23:28Z

dc.date.available

2021-06-02T20:23:28Z

dc.date.issued

2020-07

dc.date.updated

2021-06-02T20:23:26Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Technology-based systems can facilitate remote decision-making to triage patients to the appropriate level of care. Despite technologic advances, the effects of implementation of these systems on patient and utilization outcomes are unclear. We evaluated the effects of remote triage systems on healthcare utilization, case resolution, and patient safety outcomes.

Methods

English-language searches of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and CINAHL were performed from inception until July 2018. Randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies of remote triage services that reported healthcare utilization, case resolution, and patient safety outcomes were included. Two reviewers assessed study and intervention characteristics independently for study quality, strength of evidence, and risk of bias.

Results

The literature search identified 5026 articles, of which eight met eligibility criteria. Five randomized, two controlled before-and-after, and one interrupted time series study assessed 3 categories of remote triage services: mode of delivery, triage professional type, and system organizational level. No study evaluated any other delivery mode other than telephone and in-person. Meta-analyses were unable to be performed because of study design and outcome heterogeneity; therefore, we narratively synthesized data. Overall, most studies did not demonstrate a decrease in primary care (PC) or emergency department (ED) utilization, with some studies showing a significant increase. Evidence suggested local, practice-based triage systems have greater case resolution and refer fewer patients to PC or ED services than regional/national systems. No study identified statistically significant differences in safety outcomes.

Conclusion

Our review found limited evidence that remote triage reduces the burden of PC or ED utilization. However, remote triage by telephone can produce a high rate of call resolution and appears to be safe. Further study of other remote triage modalities is needed to realize the promise of remote triage services in optimizing healthcare outcomes.

Protocol registration

This study was registered and followed a published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019112262).
dc.identifier

10.1007/s11606-019-05585-4

dc.identifier.issn

0884-8734

dc.identifier.issn

1525-1497

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23331

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of general internal medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s11606-019-05585-4

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Telephone

dc.subject

Emergency Service, Hospital

dc.subject

Emergency Medical Services

dc.subject

Triage

dc.subject

Primary Health Care

dc.title

Effectiveness of Acute Care Remote Triage Systems: a Systematic Review.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Boggan, Joel C|0000-0003-3564-2807

duke.contributor.orcid

Rushton, Sharron|0000-0003-0370-9579

duke.contributor.orcid

Lewinski, Allison A|0000-0002-1356-1857

duke.contributor.orcid

Kosinski, Andrzej S|0000-0003-4151-5185

duke.contributor.orcid

Williams, John W|0000-0002-5267-5558

duke.contributor.orcid

Goldstein, Karen M|0000-0003-4419-5869

pubs.begin-page

2136

pubs.end-page

2145

pubs.issue

7

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Hematology

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

35

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JGIM post-referee version 12-3-19.docx
Size:
2.08 MB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Accepted version