Novel Approach to Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models

dc.contributor.author

Luo, Sheng

dc.contributor.author

Zou, Haotian

dc.contributor.author

Goetz, Christopher G

dc.contributor.author

Choi, Dongrak

dc.contributor.author

Oakes, David

dc.contributor.author

Simuni, Tanya

dc.contributor.author

Stebbins, Glenn T

dc.date.accessioned

2021-10-01T13:22:04Z

dc.date.available

2021-10-01T13:22:04Z

dc.date.issued

2021-01-01

dc.date.updated

2021-10-01T13:22:04Z

dc.description.abstract

Background: Although nontremor and tremor Part 3 Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale items measure different impairment domains, their distinct progression and drug responsivity remain unstudied longitudinally. The total score may obscure important time-based and treatment-based changes occurring in the individual domains. Objective: Using the unique advantages of item response theory (IRT), we developed novel longitudinal unidimensional and multidimensional models to investigate nontremor and tremor changes occurring in an interventional Parkinson's disease (PD) study. Method: With unidimensional longitudinal IRT, we assessed the 33 Part 3 item data (22 nontremor and 10 tremor items) of 336 patients with early PD from the STEADY-PD III (Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Assessment of Isradipine for PD, placebo vs. isradipine) study. With multidimensional longitudinal IRT, we assessed the progression rates over time and treatment (in overall motor severity, nontremor, and tremor domains) using Markov Chain Monte Carlo implemented in Stan. Results: Regardless of treatment, patients showed significant but different time-based deterioration rates for total motor, nontremor, and tremor scores. Isradipine was associated with additional significant deterioration over placebo in total score and nontremor scores, but not in tremor score. Further highlighting the 2 separate latent domains, nontremor and tremor severity changes were positively but weakly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.108). Conclusions: Longitudinal IRT analysis is a novel statistical method highly applicable to PD clinical trials. It addresses limitations of traditional linear regression approaches and previous IRT investigations that either applied cross-sectional IRT models to longitudinal data or failed to estimate all parameters simultaneously. It is particularly useful because it can separate nontremor and tremor changes both over time and in response to treatment interventions.

dc.identifier.issn

2330-1619

dc.identifier.issn

2330-1619

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23865

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1002/mdc3.13311

dc.title

Novel Approach to Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Luo, Sheng|0000-0003-4214-5809

duke.contributor.orcid

Zou, Haotian|0000-0002-3595-8716

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021Luo_et_al2021MDCP.pdf
Size:
473.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version