An Objective Computational Method to Quantify Ankle Osteoarthritis From Low-Dose Weightbearing Computed Tomography.

dc.contributor.author

Tazegul, Tutku E

dc.contributor.author

Anderson, Donald D

dc.contributor.author

Barbachan Mansur, Nacime S

dc.contributor.author

Kajimura Chinelati, Rogerio Marcio

dc.contributor.author

Iehl, Caleb

dc.contributor.author

VandeLune, Christian

dc.contributor.author

Ahrenholz, Samuel

dc.contributor.author

Lalevee, Matthieu

dc.contributor.author

de Cesar Netto, Cesar

dc.date.accessioned

2023-05-31T03:44:41Z

dc.date.available

2023-05-31T03:44:41Z

dc.date.issued

2022-07

dc.date.updated

2023-05-31T03:44:40Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

The treatment of ankle osteoarthritis (OA) varies depending on the severity and distribution of the associated joint degeneration. Disease staging is typically based on subjective grading of appearance on conventional plain radiographs, with reported subpar reproducibility and reliability. The purpose of this study was to develop and describe computational methods to objectively quantify radiographic changes associated with ankle OA apparent on low-dose weightbearing CT (WBCT).

Methods

Two patients with ankle OA and 1 healthy control who had all undergone WBCT of the foot and ankle were analyzed. The severity of OA in the ankle of each patient was scored using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification using plain radiographs. For each ankle, a volume of interest (VOI) was centered on the tibiotalar joint. Initial computation analysis used WBCT image intensity (Hounsfield units [HU]) profiles along lines perpendicular to the subchondral bone/cartilage interface of the distal tibia extending across the entire VOI. Graphical plots of the HU distributions were generated and recorded for each line. These plots were then used to calculate the joint space width (JSW) and HU contrast.

Results

The average JSW was 3.89 mm for the control ankle, 3.06 mm for mild arthritis (KL 2), and 1.57 mm for severe arthritis (KL 4). The average HU contrast was 72.31 for control, 62.69 for mild arthritis, and 33.98 for severe arthritis. The use of 4 projections at different locations throughout the joint allowed us to visualize specifically which quadrants have reduced joint space width and contrast.

Conclusion

In this technique report, we describe a novel methodology for objective quantitative assessment of OA using JSW and HU contrast.

Clinical relevance

Objective, software-based measurements are generally more reliable than subjective qualitative evaluations. This method may offer a starting point for the development of a more robust OA classification system or deeper understanding of the pathogenesis and response to ankle OA treatment.
dc.identifier

10.1177_24730114221116805

dc.identifier.issn

2473-0114

dc.identifier.issn

2473-0114

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27424

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Foot & ankle orthopaedics

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/24730114221116805

dc.subject

Kellgren-Lawrence

dc.subject

ankle

dc.subject

arthritis

dc.subject

classification

dc.subject

joint space width

dc.subject

osteoarthritis

dc.subject

software-based

dc.subject

weightbearing CT

dc.title

An Objective Computational Method to Quantify Ankle Osteoarthritis From Low-Dose Weightbearing Computed Tomography.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

de Cesar Netto, Cesar|0000-0001-6037-0685

pubs.begin-page

24730114221116805

pubs.issue

3

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
An Objective Computational Method to Quantify Ankle Osteoarthritis From Low-Dose Weightbearing Computed Tomography.pdf
Size:
1.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version