Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing.

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a social health measurement framework, to test items in diverse populations and to develop item response theory (IRT) item banks.

Methods

A literature review guided framework development of Social Function and Social Relationships sub-domains. Items were revised based on patient feedback, and Social Function items were field-tested. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), two-parameter IRT modeling and evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF).

Results

The analytic sample included 956 general population respondents who answered 56 Ability to Participate and 56 Satisfaction with Participation items. EFA and CFA identified three Ability to Participate sub-domains. However, because of positive and negative wording, and content redundancy, many items did not fit the IRT model, so item banks do not yet exist. EFA, CFA and IRT identified two preliminary Satisfaction item banks. One item exhibited trivial age DIF.

Conclusion

After extensive item preparation and review, EFA-, CFA- and IRT-guided item banks help provide increased measurement precision and flexibility. Two Satisfaction short forms are available for use in research and clinical practice. This initial validation study resulted in revised item pools that are currently undergoing testing in new clinical samples and populations.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0

Publication Info

Hahn, Elizabeth A, Robert F Devellis, Rita K Bode, Sofia F Garcia, Liana D Castel, Susan V Eisen, Hayden B Bosworth, Allen W Heinemann, et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 19(7). pp. 1035–1044. 10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30105.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.