Impact of bystander-focused public health interventions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival: a cohort study.

dc.contributor.author

Blewer, Audrey L

dc.contributor.author

Ho, Andrew Fu Wah

dc.contributor.author

Shahidah, Nur

dc.contributor.author

White, Alexander Elgin

dc.contributor.author

Pek, Pin Pin

dc.contributor.author

Ng, Yih Yng

dc.contributor.author

Mao, Desmond Renhao

dc.contributor.author

Tiah, Ling

dc.contributor.author

Chia, Michael Yih-Chong

dc.contributor.author

Leong, Benjamin Sieu-Hon

dc.contributor.author

Cheah, Si Oon

dc.contributor.author

Tham, Lai Peng

dc.contributor.author

Kua, Jade Phek Hui

dc.contributor.author

Arulanandam, Shalini

dc.contributor.author

Østbye, Truls

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Ong, Marcus Eng Hock

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-02T21:00:03Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-02T21:00:03Z

dc.date.issued

2020-08

dc.description.abstract

Background

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases an individual's chance of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the frequency of bystander CPR is low in many communities. We aimed to assess the cumulative effect of CPR-targeted public health interventions in Singapore, which were incrementally introduced between 2012 and 2016.

Methods

We did a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of adult, non-traumatic OHCAs, through the Singapore registry. National interventions introduced during this time included emergency services interventions, as well as dispatch-assisted CPR (introduced on July 1, 2012), a training programme for CPR and automated external defibrillators (April 1, 2014), and a first responder mobile application (myResponder; April 17, 2015). Using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression, we modelled the likelihood of receiving bystander CPR with the increasing number of interventions, accounting for year as a random effect.

Findings

The Singapore registry contained 11 465 OHCA events between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2016. Paediatric arrests, arrests witnessed by emergency medical services, and healthcare-facility arrests were excluded, and 6788 events were analysed. Bystander CPR was administered in 3248 (48%) of 6788 events. Compared with no intervention, likelihood of bystander CPR was not significantly altered by the addition of emergency medical services interventions (odds ratio [OR] 1·33 [95% CI 0·98-1·79]; p=0·065), but increased with implementation of dispatch-assisted CPR (3·72 [2·84-4·88]; p<0·0001), with addition of the CPR and automated external defibrillator training programme (6·16 [4·66-8·14]; p<0·0001), and with addition of the myResponder application (7·66 [5·85-10·03]; p<0·0001). Survival to hospital discharge increased after the addition of all interventions, compared with no intervention (OR 3·10 [95% CI 1·53-6·26]; p<0·0001).

Interpretation

National bystander-focused public health interventions were associated with an increased likelihood of bystander CPR, and an increased survival to hospital discharge. Understanding the combined impact of public health interventions might improve strategies to increase the likelihood of bystander CPR, and inform targeted initiatives to improve survival from OHCA.

Funding

National Medical Research Council, Clinician Scientist Award, Singapore and Ministry of Health, Health Services Research Grant, Singapore.
dc.identifier

S2468-2667(20)30140-7

dc.identifier.issn

2468-2667

dc.identifier.issn

2468-2667

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29653

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

The Lancet. Public health

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30140-7

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

dc.subject

Registries

dc.subject

Survival Analysis

dc.subject

Prospective Studies

dc.subject

Program Evaluation

dc.subject

Public Health

dc.subject

Singapore

dc.subject

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

dc.title

Impact of bystander-focused public health interventions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival: a cohort study.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Blewer, Audrey L|0000-0003-2830-5191

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

pubs.begin-page

e428

pubs.end-page

e436

pubs.issue

8

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

5

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2468266720301407-main1.2.24_41.pdf
Size:
476.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format