Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

dc.contributor.author

Gesell, Sabina B

dc.contributor.author

Golden, Shannon L

dc.contributor.author

Limkakeng, Alexander T

dc.contributor.author

Carr, Christine M

dc.contributor.author

Matuskowitz, Andrew

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Lane M

dc.contributor.author

Mahler, Simon A

dc.date.accessioned

2020-08-30T16:07:27Z

dc.date.available

2020-08-30T16:07:27Z

dc.date.issued

2018-12

dc.date.updated

2020-08-30T16:07:27Z

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE:The HEART Pathway is an evidence-based decision tool for identifying emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain who are candidates for early discharge, to reduce unhelpful and potentially harmful hospitalizations. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to identify important barriers and facilitators to implementation of the HEART Pathway. STUDY SETTING:Data were collected at 4 academic medical centers. STUDY DESIGN:We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 key stakeholders (e.g., health system leaders, ED physicians). We conducted interviews before implementation of the HEART Pathway tool to identify potential barriers and facilitators to successful adoption at other regional academic medical centers. We also conducted postimplementation interviews at 1 medical center, to understand factors that contributed to successful adoption. DATA COLLECTION:Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework-driven deductive approach for coding and analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Potential barriers to implementation include time and resource burden, challenges specific to the electronic health record, sustained communication with and engagement of stakeholders, and patient concerns. Facilitators to implementation include strength of evidence for reduced length of stay and unnecessary testing and iatrogenic complications, ease of use, and supportive provider climate for evidence-based decision tools. CONCLUSIONS:Successful dissemination of the HEART Pathway will require addressing institution-specific barriers, which includes engaging clinical and financial stakeholders. New SMART-FHIR technologies, compatible with many electronic health record systems, can overcome barriers to health systems with limited information technology resources.

dc.identifier

00132577-201812000-00004

dc.identifier.issn

1535-282X

dc.identifier.issn

1535-2811

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21356

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Critical pathways in cardiology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/hpc.0000000000000154

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Public Health

dc.subject

Qualitative Research

dc.subject

Health Personnel

dc.subject

Health Plan Implementation

dc.subject

Delivery of Health Care

dc.subject

United States

dc.subject

Interviews as Topic

dc.subject

Practice Guidelines as Topic

dc.title

Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Limkakeng, Alexander T|0000-0002-9822-5595

pubs.begin-page

191

pubs.end-page

200

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Emergency Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

17

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
HEART Pathway Key Informant Manuscript-FINAL-2-22-18.docx
Size:
250.03 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Submitted version