Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
dc.contributor.author | Gesell, Sabina B | |
dc.contributor.author | Golden, Shannon L | |
dc.contributor.author | Limkakeng, Alexander T | |
dc.contributor.author | Carr, Christine M | |
dc.contributor.author | Matuskowitz, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Lane M | |
dc.contributor.author | Mahler, Simon A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-30T16:07:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-30T16:07:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-12 | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-08-30T16:07:27Z | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE:The HEART Pathway is an evidence-based decision tool for identifying emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain who are candidates for early discharge, to reduce unhelpful and potentially harmful hospitalizations. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to identify important barriers and facilitators to implementation of the HEART Pathway. STUDY SETTING:Data were collected at 4 academic medical centers. STUDY DESIGN:We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 key stakeholders (e.g., health system leaders, ED physicians). We conducted interviews before implementation of the HEART Pathway tool to identify potential barriers and facilitators to successful adoption at other regional academic medical centers. We also conducted postimplementation interviews at 1 medical center, to understand factors that contributed to successful adoption. DATA COLLECTION:Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework-driven deductive approach for coding and analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Potential barriers to implementation include time and resource burden, challenges specific to the electronic health record, sustained communication with and engagement of stakeholders, and patient concerns. Facilitators to implementation include strength of evidence for reduced length of stay and unnecessary testing and iatrogenic complications, ease of use, and supportive provider climate for evidence-based decision tools. CONCLUSIONS:Successful dissemination of the HEART Pathway will require addressing institution-specific barriers, which includes engaging clinical and financial stakeholders. New SMART-FHIR technologies, compatible with many electronic health record systems, can overcome barriers to health systems with limited information technology resources. | |
dc.identifier | 00132577-201812000-00004 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1535-282X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1535-2811 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Critical pathways in cardiology | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1097/hpc.0000000000000154 | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Public Health | |
dc.subject | Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject | Health Personnel | |
dc.subject | Health Plan Implementation | |
dc.subject | Delivery of Health Care | |
dc.subject | United States | |
dc.subject | Interviews as Topic | |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines as Topic | |
dc.title | Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Limkakeng, Alexander T|0000-0002-9822-5595 | |
pubs.begin-page | 191 | |
pubs.end-page | 200 | |
pubs.issue | 4 | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Surgery, Emergency Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | Surgery | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 17 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- HEART Pathway Key Informant Manuscript-FINAL-2-22-18.docx
- Size:
- 250.03 KB
- Format:
- Unknown data format
- Description:
- Submitted version