Hands of early primates.

dc.contributor.author

Boyer, Doug M

dc.contributor.author

Yapuncich, Gabriel S

dc.contributor.author

Chester, Stephen GB

dc.contributor.author

Bloch, Jonathan I

dc.contributor.author

Godinot, Marc

dc.date.accessioned

2019-02-26T17:04:44Z

dc.date.available

2019-02-26T17:04:44Z

dc.date.issued

2013-12

dc.date.updated

2019-02-26T17:04:43Z

dc.description.abstract

Questions surrounding the origin and early evolution of primates continue to be the subject of debate. Though anatomy of the skull and inferred dietary shifts are often the focus, detailed studies of postcrania and inferred locomotor capabilities can also provide crucial data that advance understanding of transitions in early primate evolution. In particular, the hand skeleton includes characteristics thought to reflect foraging, locomotion, and posture. Here we review what is known about the early evolution of primate hands from a comparative perspective that incorporates data from the fossil record. Additionally, we provide new comparative data and documentation of skeletal morphology for Paleogene plesiadapiforms, notharctines, cercamoniines, adapines, and omomyiforms. Finally, we discuss implications of these data for understanding locomotor transitions during the origin and early evolutionary history of primates. Known plesiadapiform species cannot be differentiated from extant primates based on either intrinsic hand proportions or hand-to-body size proportions. Nonetheless, the presence of claws and a different metacarpophalangeal [corrected] joint form in plesiadapiforms indicate different grasping mechanics. Notharctines and cercamoniines have intrinsic hand proportions with extremely elongated proximal phalanges and digit rays relative to metacarpals, resembling tarsiers and galagos. But their hand-to-body size proportions are typical of many extant primates (unlike those of tarsiers, and possibly Teilhardina, which have extremely large hands). Non-adapine adapiforms and omomyids exhibit additional carpal features suggesting more limited dorsiflexion, greater ulnar deviation, and a more habitually divergent pollex than observed plesiadapiforms. Together, features differentiating adapiforms and omomyiforms from plesiadapiforms indicate increased reliance on vertical prehensile-clinging and grasp-leaping, possibly in combination with predatory behaviors in ancestral euprimates.

dc.identifier.issn

0002-9483

dc.identifier.issn

1096-8644

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18085

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

American journal of physical anthropology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1002/ajpa.22392

dc.subject

Hand

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Primates

dc.subject

Locomotion

dc.subject

Principal Component Analysis

dc.subject

Fossils

dc.subject

Hand Bones

dc.subject

Biological Evolution

dc.title

Hands of early primates.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Yapuncich, Gabriel S|0000-0001-7371-5857

pubs.begin-page

33

pubs.end-page

78

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Evolutionary Anthropology

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

152 Suppl 57

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Boyer 2013-Hands of early primates.pdf
Size:
2.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version