Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays

dc.contributor.author

Ogle, K

dc.contributor.author

REYNOLDS, JF

dc.date.accessioned

2022-01-26T22:21:14Z

dc.date.available

2022-01-26T22:21:14Z

dc.date.issued

2004

dc.date.updated

2022-01-26T22:21:13Z

dc.description.abstract

The 'two-layer' and 'pulse-reserve' hypotheses were developed 30 years ago and continue to serve as the standard for many experiments and modeling studies that examine relationships between primary productivity and rainfall variability in aridlands. The two-layer hypothesis considers two important plant functional types (FTs) and predicts that woody and herbaceous plants are able to co-exist in savannas because they utilize water from different soil layers (or depths). The pulse-reserve model addresses the response of individual plants to precipitation and predicts that there are 'biologically important' rain events that stimulate plant growth and reproduction. These pulses of precipitation may play a key role in long-term plant function and survival (as compared to seasonal or annual rainfall totals as per the two-layer model). In this paper, we re-evaluate these paradigms in terms of their generality, strengths, and limitations. We suggest that while seasonality and resource partitioning (key to the two-layer model) and biologically important precipitation events (key to the pulse-reserve model) are critical to understanding plant responses to precipitation in aridlands, both paradigms have significant limitations. Neither account for plasticity in rooting habits of woody plants, potential delayed responses of plants to rainfall, explicit precipitation thresholds, or vagaries in plant phenology. To address these limitations, we integrate the ideas of precipitation thresholds and plant delays, resource partitioning, and plant FT strategies into a simple 'threshold-delay' model. The model contains six basic parameters that capture the nonlinear nature of plant responses to pulse precipitation. We review the literature within the context of our threshold-delay model to: (i) develop testable hypotheses about how different plant FTs respond to pulses; (ii) identify weaknesses in the current state-of-knowledge; and (iii) suggest future research directions that will provide insight into how the timing, frequency, and magnitude of rainfall in deserts affect plants, plant communities, and ecosystems.

dc.identifier.issn

0029-8549

dc.identifier.issn

1432-1939

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24243

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Oecologia

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s00442-004-1507-5

dc.subject

Soil

dc.subject

Ecosystem

dc.subject

Desert Climate

dc.subject

Rain

dc.subject

Seasons

dc.subject

Age Factors

dc.subject

Models, Biological

dc.subject

Time Factors

dc.subject

Computer Simulation

dc.subject

Plant Physiological Phenomena

dc.title

Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

282

pubs.end-page

294

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

141

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ogle-2004_Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems integrating functional types pulses thresholds and delays.pdf
Size:
406.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version