Comparative transcriptional analyses of preclinical models and patient samples reveal MYC and RELA driven expression patterns that define the molecular landscape of IBC.

dc.contributor.author

Rypens, Charlotte

dc.contributor.author

Bertucci, François

dc.contributor.author

Finetti, Pascal

dc.contributor.author

Robertson, Fredika

dc.contributor.author

Fernandez, Sandra V

dc.contributor.author

Ueno, Naoto

dc.contributor.author

Woodward, Wendy A

dc.contributor.author

Van Golen, Kenneth

dc.contributor.author

Vermeulen, Peter

dc.contributor.author

Dirix, Luc

dc.contributor.author

Viens, Patrice

dc.contributor.author

Birnbaum, Daniel

dc.contributor.author

Devi, Gayathri R

dc.contributor.author

Cristofanilli, Massimo

dc.contributor.author

Van Laere, Steven

dc.date.accessioned

2023-10-20T13:48:50Z

dc.date.available

2023-10-20T13:48:50Z

dc.date.issued

2022-01

dc.date.updated

2023-10-20T13:48:48Z

dc.description.abstract

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive disease for which the spectrum of preclinical models was rather limited in the past. More recently, novel cell lines and xenografts have been developed. This study evaluates the transcriptome of an extended series of IBC preclinical models and performed a comparative analysis with patient samples to determine the extent to which the current models recapitulate the molecular characteristics of IBC observed clinically. We demonstrate that the IBC preclinical models are exclusively estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and of the basal-like subtype, which reflects to some extent the predominance of these subtypes in patient samples. The IBC-specific 79-signature we previously reported was retrained and discriminated between IBC and non-IBC preclinical models, but with a relatively high rate of false positive predictions. Further analyses of gene expression profiles revealed important roles for cell proliferation, MYC transcriptional activity, and TNFɑ/NFκB in the biology of IBC. Patterns of MYC expression and transcriptional activity were further explored in patient samples, which revealed interactions with ESR1 expression that are contrasting in IBC and nIBC and notable given the comparatively poor outcomes of ER+ IBC. Our analyses also suggest important roles for NMYC, MXD3, MAX, and MLX in shaping MYC signaling in IBC. Overall, we demonstrate that the IBC preclinical models can be used to unravel cancer cell intrinsic molecular features, and thus constitute valuable research tools. Nevertheless, the current lack of ER-positive IBC models remains a major hurdle, particularly since interactions with the ER pathway appear to be relevant for IBC.

dc.identifier

10.1038/s41523-021-00379-6

dc.identifier.issn

2374-4677

dc.identifier.issn

2374-4677

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29294

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

NPJ breast cancer

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1038/s41523-021-00379-6

dc.title

Comparative transcriptional analyses of preclinical models and patient samples reveal MYC and RELA driven expression patterns that define the molecular landscape of IBC.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Devi, Gayathri R|0000-0001-9158-7289

pubs.begin-page

12

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Surgical Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

8

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative transcriptional analyses of preclinical models and patient samples reveal MYC and RELA driven expression pattern.pdf
Size:
1.84 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format