Creatinine- versus cystatin C-based renal function assessment in the Northern Manhattan Study.
dc.contributor.author | Husain, S Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Willey, Joshua Z | |
dc.contributor.author | Park Moon, Yeseon | |
dc.contributor.author | Elkind, Mitchell SV | |
dc.contributor.author | Sacco, Ralph L | |
dc.contributor.author | Wolf, Myles | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Ken | |
dc.contributor.author | Wright, Clinton B | |
dc.contributor.author | Mohan, Sumit | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-01T16:34:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-01T16:34:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01 | |
dc.date.updated | 2019-05-01T16:34:29Z | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND:Accurate glomerular filtration rate estimation informs drug dosing and risk stratification. Body composition heterogeneity influences creatinine production and the precision of creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr) in the elderly. We compared chronic kidney disease (CKD) categorization using eGFRcr and cystatin C-based estimated GFR (eGFRcys) in an elderly, racially/ethnically diverse cohort to determine their concordance. METHODS:The Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS) is a predominantly elderly, multi-ethnic cohort with a primary aim to study cardiovascular disease epidemiology. We included participants with concurrently measured creatinine and cystatin C. eGFRcr was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2009 equation. eGFRcys was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2012 equation. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of factors associated with reclassification from eGFRcr≥60ml/min/1.73m2 to eGFRcys<60ml/min/1.73m2. RESULTS:Participants (n = 2988, mean age 69±10yrs) were predominantly Hispanic, female, and overweight/obese. eGFRcys was lower than eGFRcr by mean 23mL/min/1.73m2. 51% of participants' CKD status was discordant, and only 28% maintained the same CKD stage by both measures. Most participants (78%) had eGFRcr≥60mL/min/1.73m2; among these, 64% had eGFRcys<60mL/min/1.73m2. Among participants with eGFRcr≥60mL/min/1.73m2, eGFRcys-based reclassification was more likely in those with age >65 years, obesity, current smoking, white race, and female sex. CONCLUSIONS:In a large, multiethnic, elderly cohort, we found a highly discrepant prevalence of CKD with eGFRcys versus eGFRcr. Determining the optimal method to estimate GFR in elderly populations needs urgent further study to improve risk stratification and drug dosing. | |
dc.identifier | PONE-D-18-09465 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | PloS one | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1371/journal.pone.0206839 | |
dc.subject | Kidney | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Creatinine | |
dc.subject | Glomerular Filtration Rate | |
dc.subject | Prevalence | |
dc.subject | Risk Assessment | |
dc.subject | Prospective Studies | |
dc.subject | Age Factors | |
dc.subject | Aged | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | New York City | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Renal Insufficiency, Chronic | |
dc.subject | Cystatin C | |
dc.title | Creatinine- versus cystatin C-based renal function assessment in the Northern Manhattan Study. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
pubs.begin-page | e0206839 | |
pubs.issue | 11 | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Clinical Research Institute | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Centers | |
pubs.organisational-group | Population Health Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | Basic Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | Medicine, Nephrology | |
pubs.organisational-group | Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 13 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- Creatinine- versus cystatin C-based renal function assessment in the Northern Manhattan Study.pdf
- Size:
- 679.97 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format