Assessing intraoperative judgment using script concordance testing through the gynecology continuum of practice.

dc.contributor.author

Kow, Nathan

dc.contributor.author

Walters, Mark D

dc.contributor.author

Karram, Mickey M

dc.contributor.author

Sarsotti, Carlos J

dc.contributor.author

Jelovsek, J Eric

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2017-08-30T01:24:27Z

dc.date.available

2017-08-30T01:24:27Z

dc.date.issued

2014-08

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure surgical judgment across the Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) continuum of practice and identify factors that correlate with improved surgical judgment. METHODS: A 45-item written examination was developed using script concordance theory, which compares an examinee's responses to a series of "ill-defined" surgical scenarios to a reference panel of experts. The examination was administered to OBGYN residents, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) fellows, practicing OBGYN physicians and FPMRS experts. Surgical judgment was evaluated by comparing scores against the experts. Factors related to surgical experience were measured for association with scores. RESULTS: In total, 147 participants including 11 residents, 37 fellows, 88 practicing physicians and 11 experts completed the 45-item examination. Mean scores for practicing physicians (65.2 ± 7.4) were similar to residents (67.2 ± 7.1), and worse than fellows (72.6 ± 4.2, p < 0.001) and experts (80 ± 5, p < 0.001). Positive correlations between scores and surgical experience included: annual number of vaginal hysterectomies (r = 0.32, p = <0.001), robotic hysterectomies (r = 0.17, p = 0.048), stress incontinence (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and prolapse procedures (r = 0.37, p < 0.001). Inverse correlation was seen between test scores and years in practice. (r = -0.19, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative judgment in practicing OBGYN physicians appears similar to resident physicians. Practicing physicians who perform FPMRS procedures perform poorly on this examination of surgical judgment; lower performance correlates with less surgical experience and the greater amount of time in practice.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819908

dc.identifier.eissn

1466-187X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15394

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Informa UK Limited

dc.relation.ispartof

Med Teach

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3109/0142159X.2014.910297

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Clinical Competence

dc.subject

Cross-Sectional Studies

dc.subject

Educational Measurement

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures

dc.subject

Gynecology

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Intraoperative Period

dc.subject

Judgment

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Obstetrics

dc.title

Assessing intraoperative judgment using script concordance testing through the gynecology continuum of practice.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Jelovsek, J Eric|0000-0002-7196-817X

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819908

pubs.begin-page

724

pubs.end-page

729

pubs.issue

8

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urogynecology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

36

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Med Teach SCT Practicing GYN 2014.pdf
Size:
162.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version