Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity.
| dc.contributor.author | Srivatsan, Anjana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tehranchi, Ashley | |
| dc.contributor.author | MacAlpine, David M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Jue D | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | United States | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-21T17:31:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-01-15 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In many bacteria, there is a genome-wide bias towards co-orientation of replication and transcription, with essential and/or highly-expressed genes further enriched co-directionally. We previously found that reversing this bias in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis slows replication elongation, and we proposed that this effect contributes to the evolutionary pressure selecting the transcription-replication co-orientation bias. This selection might have been based purely on selection for speedy replication; alternatively, the slowed replication might actually represent an average of individual replication-disruption events, each of which is counter-selected independently because genome integrity is selected. To differentiate these possibilities and define the precise forces driving this aspect of genome organization, we generated new strains with inversions either over approximately 1/4 of the chromosome or at ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operons. Applying mathematical analysis to genomic microarray snapshots, we found that replication rates vary dramatically within the inverted genome. Replication is moderately impeded throughout the inverted region, which results in a small but significant competitive disadvantage in minimal medium. Importantly, replication is strongly obstructed at inverted rRNA loci in rich medium. This obstruction results in disruption of DNA replication, activation of DNA damage responses, loss of genome integrity, and cell death. Our results strongly suggest that preservation of genome integrity drives the evolution of co-orientation of replication and transcription, a conserved feature of genome organization. | |
| dc.description.version | Version of Record | |
| dc.identifier | ||
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1553-7404 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ||
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS Genet | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000810 | |
| dc.relation.journal | Plos Genetics | |
| dc.subject | Bacillus subtilis | |
| dc.subject | DNA Replication | |
| dc.subject | Genome, Bacterial | |
| dc.subject | Mutation | |
| dc.subject | Transcription, Genetic | |
| dc.title | Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity. | |
| dc.title.alternative | ||
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| duke.date.pubdate | 2010-1-0 | |
| duke.description.issue | 1 | |
| duke.description.volume | 6 | |
| pubs.author-url | ||
| pubs.begin-page | e1000810 | |
| pubs.issue | 1 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Basic Science Departments | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke Cancer Institute | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Centers | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Pharmacology & Cancer Biology | |
| pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published online | |
| pubs.volume | 6 |